Learning is primarily a matter of personal discipline; students cannot be motivated by school or college alone.
Educational institutions like schools or colleges can direct, shape or show the way how to learn but it is the sole responsibility of the students to grasp the teaching. Hence, I strongly agree with the prompt that educational institutions cannot alone motivate the students to learn.
Certainly, the institutions have some responsibility to encourage the students to acquire knowledge along with teaching, but it is not their primary duty to motivate the students. The main duty of an educational institution is to provide the students with the necessary equipment and proper teaching, and it is a matter of the personal discipline of a student to acquire the given ways and methods.
Even though a student is equipped with proper instruments to learn such as books, expert teachers, and innovative and persuasive teaching methods, it may be that the student is not likely to adhere to what his teachers’ are saying or he may find reading books boring thereby bring him in a position far from learning. For example, one might find that a number of students drop out from very highly prestigious schools or colleges. What it actually means is that these students, who dropped out, were not self-disciplined, they did not take what their institutions presented them. Therefore, the institutions could do little to motivate students for learning.
An even more dramatic example could be the earliest phase of humankind and how they learned by themselves. At that time, although, there were no such institutions which could provide structural education, people learned many essential things for survival and to shape their culture and economy. For example, the way how to grow food was not derived from any institutions rather it was individuals' own endeavour to learn them. Similarly, trade, finance, engineering every other thing was learned by humans without any institutions at the very beginning. Then, how did they learn those things? The answer is, through their own interest in learning. This explanation emphasizes the primacy of personal discipline regarding learning.
To conclude, it can be stated that students who lack personal discipline to learn cannot be motivated by the school or colleges.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | M1randa | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | KalyaniHarbola | 75 | view |
| 2023-04-22 | Vishakha Khambhaitta | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | publicresearcher95 | 75 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Pranav Lohote | 66 | view |
- A national curriculum for schools 79
- It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are generated and preserved Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing 66
- In our time specialists of all kinds are highly overrated We need more generalists people who can provide broad perspectives 50
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized 83
- In our time specialists of all kinds are highly overrated We need more generalists people who can provide broad perspectives 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, may, regarding, similarly, so, then, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 354.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9601500687 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4525206444 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335970144102 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1134544294 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114743055877 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231711104845 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134403495376 0.0667264976115 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.