The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The impact of modern lifestyle has been the emerging topic in many daily columns, whether being technology has deteriorated our creativity or social skills have been impaired by excessive machine interaction. Despite all these controversial denunciation, I believe the luxuries and conveniences are the motivations for many innovations, which nourish us into strong and independent thinkers. These two concepts, being luxuries and conveniences, should be discussed separately as their affluence is indubitably disparate.
As our society and economy is advancing, we become more in contact with luxuries, which are commonly used as indicators for our status. Given such high pedestal of ‘luxuries’ that majority of us behold, people are inclined to thrive for these high-value items either to prove themselves or to feel secured. Many of us would work hard and put all effort into accelerating our career so that one day we could afford these luxuries, which would otherwise not make possible. This is also the reason why professional with high regards are always favorable in developing countries as we look forward to climbing up the social ladder. Thus, had it not for the crave and desire towards luxuries, most people would not have a purpose to grow.
Being an advocate for convenience myself, I seize a lot of benefits of having convenience in life such as time saving and options opted. Despite our awareness, convenience is present and appreciated from our daily activities such as riding a speed train, enjoying convenient packaged foods, or using technology at work, etc. Many mundane tasks are now simplified or alleviated so that we could divert our energy in hobbies and spiritual activities, which are an essential part to build a strong and independent inner self. Instead of spending time on cooking, convenience granted us time to go for meditation, do yoga, read a book, learn a new language or engage in philanthropic events. Thus, the value that convenient options brought is tremendous.
However, some might argue that luxuries and convenience deprived us from the ability to develop ourselves in to strong and independent individuals as it turned us into materialistic and insensitive souls. I concede that the abusive attachment to convenience would sometimes blind us from the true value of life. Common phenomenon observed is that over-reliance on digital map for direction is likely to deteriorate our capability to guide ourselves. However, as the complexity of our infrastructure and transportation system, memorizing all the paths and allies might not be the best use of our time.
In conclusion, as I cogently argue above, the crave for luxuries motivate us professionally while convenience grants us time to have an options in life.
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 83
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 79
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 16
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the social ladder. Thus, had it not for the crave and desire towards luxuries, most peopl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 43, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... conclusion, as I cogently argue above, the crave for luxuries motivate us professionally...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an option' or simply 'options'?
Suggestion: an option; options
...hile convenience grants us time to have an options in life.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 440.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33636363636 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13034666578 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1302345938 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.444444444 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16874391549 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565985967184 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445593108957 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969440631194 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176677589392 0.0667264976115 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.