"Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight."
The argument concludes that unmanned space flight's investment should be increased. The conclusion is based on the premises that manned space flight is risky and also unmanned space can be proved that successfully satellites has been demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks. The argument is not logically persuasive, however, because it relies on numbers shaky assumptions for which no evidence has been given.
Firstly, the argument does not mention that unmanned space cost and manned space cost. The article did not present any data which one is more expensive. If they provide cost of amount the present space launch cost by unmmaned and manned. If they present the annual budget of manned and unmanned space flight ,we can guess the actual conditions.
Secondly, They indicated the article that unmanned space flight more secure than manned space flight . But how we can ensure that without mention the number of ancient. If they provide number of accident of manned spaced flight accident and number of unmanned space flight.
Moreover, in the argument we see that they did not mention number of series success of unmanned space and they did not clear that how many satellites they set with successfully.
In conclusion, without knowing budget figure, accident rate etc, we can not take decide the manned space flight should be closed. Here needs more evident to prove that unmanned space flight can be take information accurately is not clear. without some evidence that allows us to at least astatine these numbers, it's difficult to have any confidence in this claim.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 83 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 50 | view |
| 2022-12-31 | Kuldip851 | 66 | view |
| 2020-06-20 | impratik7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | adnan_3082 | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... gathered without the costs and risks. The argument is not logically persuasive, h...
^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...dget of manned and unmanned space flight ,we can guess the actual conditions. ...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ght more secure than manned space flight . But how we can ensure that without ment...
^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... satellites they set with successfully. In conclusion, without knowing budget fi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Without
...ke information accurately is not clear. without some evidence that allows us to at leas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 58.6224719101 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15355805243 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47864571132 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498127340824 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 704.065955056 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4872157102 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2857142857 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 5.21951772744 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438517544605 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170367244644 0.0831039109588 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130677551763 0.0758088955206 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254597738285 0.150359130593 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851526758155 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.