Manned space flight is costly and dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men and women into space. Therefore, we should invest our resources in unmanned space flight.
The letter to the editor of the national aronautics magazine surmises that resources ought to be invested in unmanned space flight owing to the higher cost and risk associated with manned flights. The argument presented in the letter is based on the recent success of a series of unmanned space flights which revealed the immense potential of such automated flights in gathering information and minimizing risk to men and women in space. However, the argument is based on unwarrented assumptions which is not cogent enought to support the notion stated in the letter for the ensuing reasons.
One of the most imperative assumptions stated in the letter is the high cost and greater risk associated with manned space flight. Although it is true that sending peple is space flight is definitely riskier and requires much more investement in terms of their safety, fooding and everything else necessary to sustain life on such flights, it is not wise to deny the fact that whatever achievements we have today in the outer space in because of such flights and the very contributions of men and women. There have been many tests with and without people in such space flights in the history, but we recall the most important ones when people set their foot in to the outer space in a manned space flights. This is all because, people have their own thinking capacity, able to make decisions as quick as blinking an eye; manned flights are able to navigate their way into the vast outerspace based on experience and their own beliefs. Unmanned/automated space flights, by contrast, are able to fly into the space without people and letting them at risk; this, however, renders such flights unable to act as per situations and unable to cope up with unexpected harsh conditions in the space. Furthermore, using manned flights may not be as expensive as unmanned flights as we have been beleiving so far; if we consider the costs incurred for initial investement for experiments destroying a large number of valuable space flights, expenses related to researching the technology itself and using them in a perfect way for real may not even bring the desired outcomes to the people. Therefore, the assumptions made by the author of the letter does not hold water.
Another crucial concern that needs to be addressed is the recent series of success gained from unmanned space probes. The letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmanned probes could be successful in reaching the outer space, it could be discussing the value of the information that have been gathered, and there is also the potential that the unmanned probes are just in testing phase and the successes were referring to the successful testing on a particular aspect of the probe only. The letter apparently states the success of the unmanned probes as a possibility not as something which has been already achieved. The unmanned space probes may not be sufficient enough to gather the evidence from the space and more tests need to be conducted in the future which will require even more time and resources than it was needed for manned space flights. If these concerns are valid, then the assumptions presented in the argument by the author in his letter are unwarranted and not cogent enough since the success of the unmanned flights are not guarranteed, and it might instead become a burden, thereby implying that it is not wise to suggest the investment on unmanned space flight without concrete evidence.
Furthermore, the unmanned space flights take too much time and resources experiment and test their efficacy and obtain results to suppor their uses in outer space. It is highly likely that the probes which were successful in testing phase might take decades or even hundreds of years to successfully explore the vast outer space which would then require astonishingly large amount of resources and investment. Unmanned space probes could be something which is wasting the precious resources that could have been used to improve the manned flights and increase their safety in the space. There is still a lot of aspects which could instead promote and enhance the current manned flights; afterall, the success rate of manned flights have been well established from successful venture into the moon and other areas of space around the earth. For these reasons, the assumptions of the author are not valid and the argument is not articulate enough suppor the notion of increasing the investment on unmanned space flights.
In conclusion, the manned space flight could be more riskier and costly to observe at a glance, but their success cannot be negated as well. Instead of wasting valuable resources on unmanned space fliht
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 83 | view |
| 2023-01-23 | Pranav Lohote | 50 | view |
| 2022-12-31 | Kuldip851 | 66 | view |
| 2020-06-20 | impratik7 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | adnan_3082 | 66 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated 66
- Because people increasingly feel compelled to share their personal details online the right to privacy is eroding Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be 66
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
- Claim When one is making a decision it is better to have a limited number of options Reason The more options a person has the more difficult it is to make a rational decision 66
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional aronautics magazine surmises that resources ought to be invested in unmann...
^^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'flight'?
Suggestion: flight
...in to the outer space in a manned space flights. This is all because, people have their...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1389, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... investement for experiments destroying a large number of valuable space flights, expenses relate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1500, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a perfect way" with adverb for "perfect"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ng the technology itself and using them in a perfect way for real may not even bring the desired...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: state
...letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmann...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'state'
Suggestion: state
...letter is quite vague since it does not states the nature of the success -- the unmann...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 660, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ething which has been already achieved. The unmanned space probes may not be suffic...
^^^
Line 7, column 688, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: after all
...and enhance the current manned flights; afterall, the success rate of manned flights hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'riskier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: riskier
...usion, the manned space flight could be more riskier and costly to observe at a glance, but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 102.0 58.6224719101 174% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3951.0 2235.4752809 177% => OK
No of words: 792.0 442.535393258 179% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98863636364 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.30495000532 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59032662358 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 316.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.39898989899 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1226.7 704.065955056 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.093961797 60.3974514979 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 179.590909091 118.986275619 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.0 23.4991977007 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411481792405 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148618745559 0.0831039109588 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806158519227 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272383563667 0.150359130593 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327485754226 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 14.1392134831 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 164.0 100.480337079 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.