Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The given argument presents a serious issue and a remedy for it. But one could notice several flaws in the given issue. First of all, if there is an outbreak of a deadly disease, then measures would be taken to arrest the spread of it and to prevent it. In olden days, many deaths were witnessed due to the fact that medicines to cure a particular disease or a vaccination to prevent their occurrence were not discovered. if such a remedy had been found in earlier days, then the deaths of millions of people around the world would have been stopped. Nevertheless, an issue addressed here represents a disease whose inoculation is readily available. In such a case, it is better to make the people administer it on a routine basis which could pavé way for the rescue of thousands of people belonging to the area where the cow flu is prevalent. Moreover, in the second statement a contradictory sentence is made use of. Since there is a small possibility of people dying as a result of inoculation, permitting on a routine basis is under objection. Even though the possibilities are minimal, it should be noted that every life on earth is precious and that humans have the responsibility to save the lives of personal living in this universe.
Discovery of vaccinations are considered as a boon to humanity. A remedy available should be made use of to a greater possible extent. Before a dilemma strikes our mind, we must think of the lives lost due to smallpox, measles, cancer, AIDS and many other incurable diseases.
Thus, we can conclude that there is no harm in administering the inoculation regularly as only a boon could be foreseen rather than a bane.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Swetha Kulkarni | 33 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vaikunth | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | Vaikunth | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | vijaykaushik132 | 58 | view |
| 2019-09-16 | vijaykaushik132 | 50 | view |
- Technology has made children less creative than they are in past.Agree or disagree? 78
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements withing that field. 50
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
- TPO-18: students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...t their occurrence were not discovered. if such a remedy had been found in earlier...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...AIDS and many other incurable diseases. Thus, we can conclude that there is no h...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n could be foreseen rather than a bane.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, then, thus, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 2235.4752809 62% => OK
No of words: 291.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.735395189 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83145663988 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1561789703 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4285714286 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287717744377 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719861316631 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694531484098 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150322756725 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812075002817 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.