Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks? This conclusion I have found wanting, and can also attribute to lack of knowledge of the systems at play in today's world. The disparity and / or similarity in roles played by men and women in today's world can be intertwined, as men actively play traditionally-known 'roles' dominated by women and vice versa.
Starting from the premise that we do not choose what gender we are born with, as a result of technological advancements in today's world, one can choose what sex or gender one so desires and is comfortable with. Total gender transformations can be done through surgeries, equipping women with the inherent physical qualities men possess and vice versa. Thus, the proposition that they are not equally suited for many tasks can be found to be inconclusive.
'What are the roles played by men or women?', one might ask. Is it in the home? At the office? Roles that require hard labor? Roles that require the instincts of a woman? and so on. We do know that with the help of the internet and an aptitude for learning, anyone can learn just about anything, gendr notwithstanding. Thus, men can be found maintaining the homes with or without the help of a woman, women can also be found engaging in masculine roles such as manual lifting of load, and so on.
However, it can also be noted that there are certain tasks women do, that men are not suited for; for example, the task of pregnancy and delivery of a baby. Till date, women are thus, the natural means for pro-creation, as men are not equipped with the physical abilities and organs to pro-create. Also, and on the other hand, men are responsible for producing the sperms needed for gestation and pro-creation. This notwithstanding, technological advancements can - in the nearest future - change these narrative. Asides this, I beg to differ, that there are no other roles, one of the sexes does that the other cannot do. Men can learn to fully be responsible for childcare, just as women can also train their male and female children effectively. Men can cook, and take care of the home, just as women can be the breadwinners for families.
Furthermore, we have seen that women - who were perceived to be the weaker vessels - can perform excellently in male-dominated careers such as Medicine, Engineering, Law, Government, and so on and so forth, as they can also learn to be great leaders and are equally able to drive teams to success. Women have been Presidents and Heads of State since time immemorial and will continue to do so, efficiently. Men have also performed well in such roles traditionally known to be dominated by women as midwives, nurses, cosmeticians, beauticians etc.
Hence and in conclusion, the argument - I believe - should be 'Men and women, because of their inherent and learned skills and qualities, are not equally suited for many tasks'.
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants powerful anti aging and immune system boosting compounds Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day the greater the benefits Green tea however contains moder 59
- GRE Argument An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers 48
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 70
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 54
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterward are poor decision makers 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
... that require the instincts of a woman? and so on. We do know that with the help of...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rses, cosmeticians, beauticians etc. Hence and in conclusion, the argument - I bel...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2437.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88376753507 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89737676849 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470941883768 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.9965660631 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.48 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366205973247 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121978442047 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180835408587 0.0758088955206 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238962120614 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.138406651182 0.0667264976115 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.