A nation should require all its students to the study the same national curriculum until they enter college

Essay topics:

A nation should require all its students to the study the same national curriculum until they enter college

There are several countries where each state of the country has their own educational curriculum. Each state has their own syllabus that differs from the other states. The question is whether independent educational curriculums for each state is beneficial. The recommendation suggests that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. I partially agree with this statement.

Every student needs to learn the basic subjects basic fundamental subjects in school before they choose a field to specialise in, when they enter college. Since every student has to study the same fundamentals then it makes sense to have a national curriculum for all students in a nation. This will make education equal throughout the country. Each student will be taught the same national curriculum and will take the same examinations. This will make it very easy to understand to compare student's performance to one another. For instance, in India, there is a separate educational curriculum for each state. Each state curriculum differs in content, method of teaching and concepts being taught. This causes a few discrepancies. When applying to national colleges, students from states with easier curriculums have higher scores and thus have an advantage. To prevent this, some universities have to scale scores to make it just, while some do not. These differences and disadvantages that arise with different curriculums can be overcome by having the same curriculum for students all over the country.

However, there are some disadvantages to the above recommendation. States in a nation are different from one another in several ways. For example, in a country like India, each state has its own dominant language. If curriculum was to be nationalised, this would cause many state languages to lose importance and eventually stop being spoken. This is where a state curriculum is advantageous. It provides knowledge to students of the state while still preserving each state culture.

Thus, I believe that one cannot just universally decide that each nation must have the same national curriculum. Each nation differs from another. A national curriculum might work for one nation, while failing for another. Thus, each nation must decide what suits their country. If a nation that is small has one predominant language, one culture, then a national education might be suitable. But, in a country as cosmopolitan and large as India, other educational reforms might work.

To conclude, I belive each country must figure out solutions that help in the progress of their students. Fundamentally, each student must be given the same fundamental knowledge to make education equal throughout the country while also including each state's own curriculum in it. Perhaps an integrated system which combines a nationalised curriculum that is same for all with a statewise curriculum that is relevant to each state, might have a better effect on the education system

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-18 ekarumeblessing@icloud.com 66 view
2024-11-09 KLH 66 view
2024-09-28 ascetichedonist 83 view
2024-08-27 Rishab@1999 50 view
2024-07-25 BRUHATHI2 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user harsh_harwani :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'understand comparing'.
Suggestion: understand comparing
...nations. This will make it very easy to understand to compare students performance to one another. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, thus, while, as to, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32983193277 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9065389888 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441176470588 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4214787177 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8387096774 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3548387097 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77419354839 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.83258426966 372% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35457028839 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107022296605 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154122736706 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221348776949 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101600702115 0.0667264976115 152% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.