A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
For some subjects which has same application everywhere for example, science, mathematics, literature there should be a same national curriculum: however, for some subjects like history, political sciences and those subjects which has some connections from a regional area the curriculum should be dependent on that region.
When we look at the STEM(science, technology, engineering and mathematics) courses. They have same application throughout the world. For instance, if someone is doing a particular chemistry experiment in America would have same result if it were done in India. Simillarly, when accountents do accounting in Pakistan then the process of accounting will be same as the process followed by German Accountants. So, if the syllabus of schools will be same for all the schools in above mentioned subjects then it will be advantageous because everyone will understand same thing and everyone can help each other in a more productive way as everyone has studied the same things.
There are some subjects like history, geography, political science, disaster management etc. require some more attention of a particular region. For example, suppose someone is living in North India and studying history of South India won't help him until he goes to South India. Usually, people love to live where they born and there won't be a lot of people which will migrate from one area to another. So, reading history of other region won't help them much. Similarly, in disaster management, there are some problems which are observed in a particular region. For instance, Middle East face more thunder storms and east side of India face more floods. So, if students study a common syllabus in disaster management then it neither won't help students living in a particular region nor people if they face a disaster which is common to that region however it is not taught to students.
In conclusion, no doubt, some subjects has same application worldwide however some subjects deals with a knowledge of some special regions. So, for some subjects the syllabus should be same nationwide but for others, it should be dependent on which are students are currently living on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | Siddhant412 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | SamikshaVarpe | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | TiOluwani97 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | TiOluwani97 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'bore'?
Suggestion: bore
...Usually, people love to live where they born and there wont be a lot of people which...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, similarly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1827.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20512820513 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77542306508 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472934472934 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.0457152341 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.1875 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136035158298 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0449303792867 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041592405945 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948607263578 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292487683636 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.