A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
It is true that requiring all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college has many benefits to the nation and students. However, for some special fields such as music and sports, they need some different curriculums.
First, requiring all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college can save money. If the school adopts different curriculums to teach students, it will be a huge cost for the school. Because they need to find teachers from different professions, it not only takes time but also needs to employ more teachers. This will give those rural schools which already lack money to maintain their rudimental cost more pressure.
Moreover, it makes all students have the same chance to learn with the same curriculum. Parity will become the most important factor to maintain this statement. In modern society, the gap between the city and the rural area become more huge. Students in the city have too many resources to learn more knowledge and skills. Therefore, if a nation could require all of its students to study the same national curriculum in school, it can make its effort to avoid the gap keep growing.
However, for some special fields such as music and sports, students need to learn these skills when they are young. Because these skills need time to cultivate, students spend lots of time to hone their performing skills or playing skills. For example, students who professors in piano need to cultivate how to perform the music more beautifully, honing skills takes time. Therefore, they need to acquire some different and professor curriculum to learn. When they grow up, they can promote their countries by performing in the world. It can make the whole world know their countries.
In contrast to the statement, I partly agree that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college, while some special fields such as music and sport need to accept different professor curriculums.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 79
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you prefer visiting popular places with many tourists or places with fewer people 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in contrast, such as, in contrast to, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02949852507 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46861945661 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47197640118 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6193779527 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7222222222 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485452365228 0.243740707755 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172240921274 0.0831039109588 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.246760193357 0.0758088955206 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353163027343 0.150359130593 235% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.16342846854 0.0667264976115 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 100.480337079 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.