Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Whether teachers should make their social or political views known to students in the classroom has triggered long-term debated issues. Some are adamant that expressing the statement might influence students' views, while others consider it is a problem. In my view, the former is more acceptable. More reasons and examples are shed light on as follows.
First and Foremost, teachers' role is to cultivate students' multi-aspect thinking, and expressing their social or political views to students might influence their views. For instance, teachers usually raise some issue of whether the government should stop using nuclear power. The ideal way for discussing is to lead students to brainstorm to propose different aspects of the statement, and it makes students learn to put themselves in the other's place so that they might not fall into disputes when they discuss this issue with others. On the other hand, expressing teachers' view of nuclear power might cause students to be affected by the preconceived view, because teachers frequently are the learning goal for students, which they might admire and expect themselves can be as smart and wise as teachers.
In addition, it is essential for teachers to be objective and fair roles in the school, and stating their social or political views might break these images. Students in the school usually have arguments because of different views, and teachers should be fair and objective to stop students' fight and not be partial to each student. It is because that people are apt to have a positive image of people who have the same views. Thus, when teachers teach them not to dispute and argue, they sometimes express their views unintentionally to students, which might make students learn that this view is correct and unquestionable.
In conclusion, teachers should pay attention to avoid their statements being known to students. It is because teachers' role of leading students to have multi-aspect thinking and facing every dispute in objectiveness is indispensable.
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives Use specific reasons and examples to su 76
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 53
- The best way to know a city you visit for the first time and only have a short time to stay 1 historical sites 2 shop and markets 3 local restaurants Cafe 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26234567901 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7480074809 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1016865514 48.9658058833 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.785714286 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298340326907 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120074341077 0.076458572812 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827983475167 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211415209052 0.150856017488 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549079943808 0.0645574589148 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.