The best way to know a city you visit for the first time and only have a short time to stay.
1. historical sites
2. shop and markets
3. local restaurants & Cafe
Which place is the best to know a city when people visit for the first time with only having a short time time to stay? When it comes to this question of which place, answers differ from individual to individual. Some are adamant that historical sites give them sufficient life experience, others hold that shop and markets are vital places to understand the city, still others prefer to local restaurants and cafe. All statements are convincing and stand on points, yet my experience and real-life example lead me to conclude that historical sites is my primary decision to visit. More reasons and examples will be shed light on as follows.
To begin with, budget is my essential consideration, and historical sites can achieve this goal. Take me as an example, I am just a student, so spending money carefully is vital for me. Fortunately, tickets of most historical sites in Taiwan cost few moneys. Moreover, many temples in Taiwan do not need any tickets, and people can walk around to enjoy the solemn atmosphere. On the contrary, when we visit the local shop and markets, eating local foods easily costs us substantial money. Similarly, local restaurants and Café sale exquisite meals, which price is usually high. Therefore, attending historical sites is proper decision.
In addition, when travel to other cities, I prefer to comprehend local knowledge, and it can be got by visiting historical sites. For instance, it is common for historical sites to provide information of local history and traditional culture. Moreover, although we don’t realize local language, these historical sites often provide English information to let people from different parts of the world apprehend local cultural knowledge. By contrast, both markets and local restaurants can only satisfy our stomach, not getting any knowledge from them.
Last but not least, I focus on the quality of the trip, and visiting historical sites can have a high-quality trip. Take the historical site in Taipei as examples, the government offers many convenient transportations such as MRT or bus to pass by these historical places. Moreover, many free tourist trips to let visitors to learn more about the city. Besides, clean and enough restrooms, delicious snack bars and cool resting place cause all visitors have comfortable experience. In contrast, shop and markets sometimes hard to find the toilet, while some local restaurants and café is difficult to be found.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Is it beneficial to stop reading and listening to the news for a few days or weeks Agree or Disagree 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People care more about public recognition than about money Even if no more money is given public recognition can still make people work harder 76
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 83
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 102, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: time
...the first time with only having a short time time to stay? When it comes to this question...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2055.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17632241814 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76552971607 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584382871537 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.125702105 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388474421424 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970478264427 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109029715957 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22339965635 0.150856017488 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095338081986 0.0645574589148 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.