Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people prefer to travel abroad or just have a trip in their own countries when they are on their vacation, because we can experience different cultures and varied beautiful scenery. To enjoy the exotic atmosphere or valuable tradional culture, every traveler should have full preparation for the trip. Some people decide to attend the travel group handled by the travel agency, while others tend to organize and plan by themselves. In my view, planning a trip by myself is a fascinating way to soak in the enjoyment. There are some reasons in the following essay to justify my stance.
First, we will not be restrained by the schedule planned by the agency. When we notice that the place is more interesting and appealing than our prediction at first, we can not easily change the journey though we really want to stop our pace and find a coffee shop to enjoy the atmosphere the city gives us. For instance, I went to Paris with my family when I was a child. At that time we attend a group trip held by a journey agency. We found that we really are attracted by majestic historical buildings such as Triumphal Arch and Eiffel Tower. It sparks our curiosity to visit deeply to explore the fascination of the city. However, we fail to achieve our current idea, because the schedule of the agency is rigid.
In addition, we can avoid some disputes with other passengers so that there is no embarrassment on the trip. Because we choose who to go with us, we can ensure that the personality and habits of travel mates are suitable for us. For example, I invite my friend to go to Japan with me to enjoy Japanese culture and their food. Without a doubt, planning a journey by myself may sometimes encounter an accident such as getting lost in the countryside or missing the train. My travel companion may have to accept this negligence and tolerate my behavior. Besides, everyone has their own eating habits so that we can easily have a consensus of the restaurant. If I wanted to eat ramen noodles while my travel mate who comes with me on a group journey preferred to sussi, we might not make a decision efficiently. It not only wastes time but also destroys our relationship.
In conclusion, the tour guide isn't a good idea to travel. The vital key of the travel is unrestrained, which means we should assimilate to the pace and ambiance of the place we go sightseeing, so that we can truely feel and experience the culture.
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 80
- Do youn agree or disagree with the following statement It s a waste of money for the government to fund space travel or space exploration Give specific examples and details to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...onship. In conclusion, the tour guide isnt a good idea to travel. The vital key of...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 43.0788530466 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62962962963 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62672635766 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525462962963 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4597933346 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9090909091 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903232558481 0.236089414692 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334785796955 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374571026986 0.0737576698707 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658952162403 0.150856017488 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302934092851 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.