A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
On first glance, the issue at hand suggests that all students of a nation must fall under the same curriculum. But on further investigation of the topic, one would disagree with this statement, since the choice to study a certain curriculum must be left up to discretion of the students themselves.
Firstly, every curriculum has a different standard of learning. Some of them may be at a higher level, the others might be for the slower learners. These class of students require a simplification of topics, in order to grasp it. Hence, if everyone were required to study the same curriculum until college, the repercussions will be horrendous! For example, if an exceptionally bright student were to be put into an average level curriculum, he might find it highly mundane. This could result in him losing interest in the topic! On the other hand, if a laggard was put into a normal level curriculum, he would find it hard to cope with the syllabus. Eventually, causing him to be overcome with frustration, resulting in a loss of interest! Never the less, an average students would remain average, and yet, we would not seem them strive to achieve more, due to a lack of stimuli.
Secondly, having multiple syylabbi, has it's own advantages. The number of students, in India for example, is exceptionally high! Our country has 3-4 primary curriculums, through which majority of the students graduate. Now consider a student from one curriculum his counter-part from another curriculum, we would see stark differences in their approach towards a particular problem. This would enable us to view a problem with the help of multiple views, and provide us a with a 'Systems Approach' towards any task! This, in my opinion, is the most effective approach to even the most gargantuan task.
From the factors mentioned and unmentioned, we can surely conclude that the nation must not take up a single curriculum for all students until college. They must instead, provide the students with the options, and allow them to peruse them, and choose the one they prefer the most. This could be a crucial choice, because it may determine whether our country will continue producing the top world leaders, scientists, atheletes, etc. This may appear a small step for the government, but it is a major step towards the country's development!
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 66
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e mail correspondence Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity as well as protect the company from lawsuits 90
- AsthmaAsthma is ussually seen as a condition whose symptoms can be adequately controlled with the right medicines. Researchers point out that it is an intermittent disorder,characterized by temporary bouts of inflammation of the airways,which lead to typ 3
- The following appeared in an editorial in the Mason City newspaper."At present, Mason City residents seldom use the nearby Mason River for any kind of recreational activity, even though surveys of the region's residents consistently rank water sports (swi 58
- The following is a letter from the parent of a private school student to the principal of that school:Last year, Kensington Academy turned over management of its cafeteria to a private vendor, Swift Nutrition. This company serves low-fat, low-calorie meal 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ON_FIRST_GLANCE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'at'?
Suggestion: At
On first glance, the issue at hand suggest...
^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[1]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually not used at the beginning of a sentence.
...ation, resulting in a loss of interest! Never the less, an average students would rem...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'student'?
Suggestion: student
...of interest! Never the less, an average students would remain average, and yet, we would...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98461538462 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83882169443 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55641025641 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0423946669 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251225585529 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818317864593 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854231613644 0.0758088955206 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154148445128 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572945984208 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.