A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting you position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

One of a nation's greatest duties to its citizens is the responsibility that it has to ensure that all idividuals are given an opportunity to receive a proper education. However, what exactly defines a "proper" education? Is there a way to standarize this education in order to perfectly match the needs of each student in an entire country? Some would argue that this is possible, and to a certain extent, that may be the case. Essentially, a nation should establish minimum benchmarks for students to reach in order mark progress, but a nation should not demand that all students follow the same curriculum due to that fact that this does not recognize the variety of different needs and strengths that each student has and contributes to the classroom. Furthermore, this "hit-or-miss" style curriculum does not acknoweldge specials needs or other accomodations that some students require in order to learn effectively.

All individuals are unique to how they learn the most efficiently and, more importantly, use that learning to develop key traits that will allow them to be successful in life. Some students are visual learners and need pictures or images to aid them in conceptualizing a lesson, while others are better adept at understanding lessons in a vocal or auditory way. Implementing a curriculum that only employs either visual or auditory methods of teaching would leave one of these two students at a great disadvantage to learning. Teacher's should continually be given the opportunity to change the classroom to meet the needs of every single student, not mold each student into a clay model of the nation's universal ideal student.

Still yet, other students pick up mathematics extremely well and seem to have a way with numbers when others, who are maybe less adept with numbers, could easily run miles without end on the track field. Each of these individuals has a special way of expressing him or herself that may present in an amalgam of fields ranging from the computational to the athletic. If the standard is set to only praise those who exhibit the computational and not the athletic, there is the possibility of hindering the "slower" individual's learning by lowering his or her self esteem. If a pedagogy is to only recognize the attributes of one of these students, imbalance is sure to take place both in and outside of the classroom. In this sense, the nation would not only lack in contribution to that student's learning in the classroom, but also, in a sense, hinder it. This allows little room for those who either cannot keep up or those who find the material too easy to excel. It may cause slower students to feel stupid or dumb and, hence, lower their self-esteem while causing the students who learn quickly to become bored and unchallenged.

Furthermore, some students, particularly those with disabilities, require certain accomodations in the classroom. A standardized curriculum that does not meet these needs would hinder them from being able to have an equal opportunity to learn on the same playing field as other children in the classroom.

In conclusion, although the nation should be required to set minimum standards with which should be met in order for an individual to meet college requirements, the nation should not demand that all students follow the exact same "standardized" curriculum. Although standardization could be good to establish a minimum of required to knowledge to prepare students to enter college, it should not establish a "one size fits all" education.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 lekuleku 62 view
2020-01-18 vineel 58 view
2020-01-13 jason123 20 view
2020-01-12 jamaya8 66 view
2019-11-30 IFE360TOXIC 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user asianflamme :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
One of a nations greatest duties to its citizens is the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'nations the greatest'.
Suggestion: nations the greatest
One of a nations greatest duties to its citizens is the responsib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ducation. However, what exactly defines a 'proper' education? Is there ...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...he nations universal ideal student. Still yet, other students pick up mathematics...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 417, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... enter college, it should not establish a 'one size fits all' education...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, while, as to, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3007.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 583.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15780445969 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91379618374 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20111811093 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481989708405 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 936.0 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2077409411 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.19047619 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7619047619 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203788464568 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601370272634 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645786809696 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122576563213 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663449301306 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.