A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

No one can gainsay that education system is one of the most fundamentals for our society to develop by cultivating competent next-generations. In this sense, indisputably, some people are in the opinion that standardized school system may hamper improvement of creativity and level-oriented lectures for different academic levels of students. However, not everyone agrees on such position. In some cases, uniformity in education can enhance efficiency in school administration and academic performance of students.

First and foremost, there are some people who argue that this standard system can engender several disadvantages. One of the main problems is that teachers cannot organize a school curriculum to contain new or original contents, as their classes are confined to the standard national system. This can deter the development of creative activities or lectures for students and may decrease their potential for innovative thinking. Another problem can be that this invariable system can force every student to take the same classes, regardless of their diverse level and interests. Teachers are not able to provide one-to-one approache, being overwhelmed by the pressure to finish their lectures on time. As seen in above examples, the same school curriculum can create various issues for developing students’ capacity as well as considering their academic levels.

However, what was alluded above should not be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with those negative sides, there are certainly positive aspects of the approach. Firstly, the same curriculum can provide students with mobility to move their houses from city to city but still keep up with the curriculum in their new hometown. This is because every school shares the same curriculum, students can often feel convenient and comfortable to adjust to the new environment and engage in studying again. In addition, it also helps school authorities to evaluate students by their grades, as they all take the same courses. In particular, it is effectual for the university to choose the best candidates based on their score of the university entrance exam and their school grades, because they all have the same course and similar tests. Thus, this system facilitates the admistrative process of students’ moving and school’s fair appraisal of the academic performance of students.

Furthermore, the standized schooling can offer the competitive environment among students. This is mainly due to the fact that they all involve in the same curriculum and are forced to compete with more students for getting high grade. In this way, they will be inclined to focus on studying, which will lead to an overall increase in their academic achievement. Hence, this system can foster rigorous educational atmosphere, and it will help to drive students to take part in school lectures and show their best performance.

To sum up, there is no denying the fact that uniform curriculum can impede the development of creativity and individual-oriented courses considering students’ academic levels. However, there are certainly advantageous aspects in the system, such as admistrative efficiency as well as rigorous environment to let students engage harder in the school. Therefore, we should aim to develop well-organized education system that benefits students and school but also helps students develop their skills and knowledge.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 AlmeeC. 58 view
2020-01-29 lekuleku 62 view
2020-01-23 nikhil40507 50 view
2020-01-18 greuela001 50 view
2020-01-18 vineel 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user noel11051105 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in particular, such as, as well as, in some cases, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2913.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 523.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56978967495 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78217453174 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10618195738 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481835564054 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 927.0 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.650050309 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.375 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7916666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16686713694 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533556251524 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522985166337 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982385482316 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607550961376 0.0667264976115 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.