Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Earth has been inhabited by millions of species of organisms in its lifetime. Humans or homo sapiens is just one of them. There was no such law written to give away the monopoly of all of Earth and it’s resources to just one species to be used in whichever way it pleased. The Earth equally belongs to all the organisms that exist and no one species gets to choose the fate of all the others.
It is this simple principle of equity and fairness upon which I base my argument. And in light of such a view, I agree with the given statement which prompts all countries to preserve whatever wilderness remains and in no circumstances, endanger their existence if it costs them their valuable “economic growth”. I feel that this any growth happens over a long period of time but which economic growth’s benefits would we reap if our Earth itself doesn’t exist ? What future do we have if the earth doesn’t have one? And upto what point do we need to keep growing? When do we stop? We need to draw a line somewhere. We cannot simply allow just about anything in the name of “growth and development of our economy”.
We have mindlessly extracted so many minerals that now scientists are panicking about not having any in the near future. The land near the mines are barren now not capable of any forestation. And we did not even bother to do something about it now that we have our minerals to earn money from. Large number of animals are left homeless but we couldn’t care less. Animals themselves are being butchered for whatever we can get out of them ———be it the flesh for eating, skins for medicinal purposes or even for adding aesthetic values to our living rooms———- it’s all justified for us as long as it is providing us with any economical gain.
Now I feel that nature is quite a developed ecosystem in itself. And why not? It has been here for billions of years and we petty humans are imbeciles, having existed for just over 200,000 years! The earth can and will take care of itself. It is us who need to take care of ourselves by taking care of the ecosystem that we are a part of. If we keep abusing what we have, we soon will run out of resources to survive and yes, the earth too will suffer, but only temporarily. It will heal and be again full of life in a few thousands of years. It is us, humans who will perish and go out of existence.
So respecting what we have now and curbing our demands will allow us to be in harmony with Earth. It is still not too late to make a change. We can preserve and even help whatever is left of the wilderness to grow and prosper. Yes, our economy may not grow as fast as we want but it will be alright. Having a balanced life is the way to go.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | wenki31 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | Md. Kawsar Ahmed | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-14 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | KarinaShine | 83 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 62
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 66
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 54
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hat this any growth happens over a long period of time but which economic growth's benefi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... simply allow just about anything in the name of 'growth and development of ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...development of our economy'. We have mindlessly extracted so many miner...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 33.0505617978 206% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 508.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4625984252 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62480882971 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482283464567 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.5674180707 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.1724137931 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5172413793 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.06896551724 5.21951772744 20% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115506883679 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281827946283 0.0831039109588 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443517219501 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664513054354 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392899706411 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.29 12.1639044944 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.