As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Technology has always encouraged critical thinking and has allowed for deeper human inquiry into topics where it has assisted in many discoveries.
For centuries, technology has assisted in enabling humans to think individualistically and question dogma. Thinkers, scientists, inventors, and the like have used technologies to advance thought, science, and industry, respectively. Consider the telescope and the role it played in learning about the how the solar system works. At the time, it was common belief that the Earth was in the center of the solar system, yet the telescope helped derail the misconception. Technology can be a tool to assist new thought.
Through time, history has seen technology build on itself to advance human development and understanding of the world. The creation of new technologies has the same effect as dominoes falling on one another, each domino pushing its reach a bit further. Before the Industrial Revolution, factory laborers completed most work manually. However, starting with the cotton gin, factory work changed forever. In the following century, new inventions, like the steam engine, followed one another, each improving from the one before. Technology has shown that it facilitates development, in that it builds off itself.
With new inventions, old skills are lost, jobs are made easier, and, often, less thought is required. One might think today's technologies leave people too comfortable and complacent, with no reason to exert effort into new lines of thought. For example, even with the consensus of climate scientists on the existence of climate change, people can deny or ignore its effects with many of today's technologies. Air conditioning allows people to stay at a comfortable temperature in their homes on days with record-breaking temperatures. Also, sea walls, and equipment required to build them, protect homes from rising sea levels. Clearly, certain technologies can allow for such complacency.
For the most part, technology facilitates individualistic and new thinking and has encouraged new thought, inventing, discoveries by building on itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 82
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 16
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The following appeared as part of a letter to the editor of a scientific journal."A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimul 29
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 298, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...nd the role it played in learning about the how the solar system works. At the time, it...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 517, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gy can be a tool to assist new thought. Through time, history has seen technolog...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5524691358 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09955691776 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598765432099 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9193929364 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.6842105263 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57894736842 5.21951772744 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149152372204 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049229151595 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051954669903 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957058254287 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275852297769 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.