As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Many of us have expressed that technology makes us stupid these days, but is it really so! Technology expand our knowledge, capability, effectiveness, creativity of thinking and make us more innovative.
In recent century, human have being developing the technology rapidly and deserve some credit for it. With the advancement of technology human is achieving vast knowledge of variety of unknown mystery which they don’t know before. For example, by helping internet anyone can get information of any places, human habit, food, there life style, taboo, tradition etc. and many more where they never known. If someone wants to acquire knowledge about science, astronomy, biology, physics, humanity etc. anything related to study they just need to search on internet, they will get variety of materials just in one click that they never imagine. These is gives us innovative idea and open vast area of knowledge. Moreover, it makes any work time consuming and effective.
Secondly, communication is so available that anyone can communicate with other side of world in just a minute which is impossible just a two decade ago by helping an e-mail, telephone, cell, and social media and also very reliable source. Some protest that, social media, internet have a terrible impact on young generation and children mentally and physically; other objection that they are becoming lazy and capability of practical realization is deteriorating but hardly it is true. It has currently seemed that their ability of thinking is deteriorating but if you looked back previous decades young generation are smarting by developing of the technology.
At last, technology has increased our self-efficacy, productivity, knowledge. But our first challenge how to provide it to every human in this world and make it more useful without any worse impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tarun9927 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | vivek2upad | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 54 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Schools should cut funding for extracurricular activities such as sports and the arts when schoolbuildings are in need of repair. 50
- tpo 47Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged reptiles that lived alongside the dinosaurs. Many pterosaurs were very large, some as large as a giraffe and with a wingspan of over 12 meters. Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs we 78
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 70
- tpo 32sounds "quackers" (from the Russian word for frog sounds). The sources of the sound seemed to be moving with great speed and agility;however, the submarines' sonar (a method of detecting objects underwater) was unable to detect any so 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 647, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[4]
Message: Did you mean 'this'?
Suggestion: This
...t in one click that they never imagine. These is gives us innovative idea and open va...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 702, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us innovative idea and open vast area of knowledge. Moreover, it makes any work t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 290.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35172413793 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88248637553 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7783597188 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163872016431 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533086306233 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04389032221 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963586289145 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409079963434 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.