People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

__________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The statement states that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. Yes, taking important decisions based on emotions can sometimes be very dangerous. Good decision makers don't allow their emotions to have impact on their decisions.

Taking decisions based on emotion state can be very risky.  Imagine a situation of accident chaos, unpredicted natural disasters, or a more general situations like choosing a college/career in last moment of the process, or tempted to give a try to new bad habit. In these situations, we don't have enough time to take a decision, we doesn't have control over our decision making and hence we barely rely on our emotions and just listen to what our heart says. These decisions mostly turn out to be a bad decisions.

Hence to overcome these type of situations, one should focus on improving their mental health. Mental health plays a vital role in impacting one's decision making potential. Hence, improving mental health by practicing mediation, yoga can miraculously improve one's ability to take decision in crucial times.

Finally, I agree with the statement given that taking decision solely based on emotions can have adverse effects and hence making one a poor decision maker. One should focus on their mental health to overcome this problem.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-30 yixova3193 66 view
2023-10-09 Truss 50 view
2023-10-04 Adesina Boluwatito 50 view
2023-10-01 shamika@25 50 view
2023-09-14 RIYA MODI 58 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
GMAT/GRE Issue Task
Essays by user Anvesh0910 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...be very dangerous. Good decision makers dont allow their emotions to have impact on ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... new bad habit. In these situations, we dont have enough time to take a decision, we...
^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...have enough time to take a decision, we doesnt have control over our decision making a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...stly turn out to be a bad decisions. Hence to overcome these type of situations, o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... health plays a vital role in impacting ones decision making potential. Hence, impro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ediation, yoga can miraculously improve ones ability to take decision in crucial tim...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1151.0 2235.4752809 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 220.0 442.535393258 50% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23181818182 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.55969084622 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65782409606 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 370.8 704.065955056 53% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9535950037 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.636363636 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.21951772744 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299356176201 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1378658902 0.0831039109588 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155233752581 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215477320511 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140501860321 0.0667264976115 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.