The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities.
The political support of a leader is closely related to the achievements humans accomplished under his lead. For most people only results matter, hence solving big challenges will naturally inflate the perceived greatness of a leader. While his inherent skills are usually crucial for the success of challenges, other leaders with a strong relationship to their people can still be perceived as great when showing conscience and other leadership traits.
Still, a great leader will not only solve a challenge. The mere act of tackling such an attempt is a sign of his greatness. Elon Musk is considered one of the greatest leaders of our time precisely because of this trait. By facing challenges that most people not even perceive, such as leading humanity towards a multi planetary species, he earned his right to lead and the praise he receives.
Solving difficult challenges are most often also an indication for great skill. Abraham Lincoln surely would not have managed to create his legacy without his inherent reflection skills and his highly strategic thinking. While people descry mostly the results of his doings, those do not necessarily have to result from Lincoln's abilities. He might have been lucky, or the problem easier than perceived. Yet usually, challenges of such a dimension are rather correct with their implications about the leaders abilities.
Nevertheless, in situations where there is a strong connection between the leader and his people, challenges do not need to indicate the ineptness of that person. One such example is Angela Merkel. With her frequent and often close contact to her voters, she was able to show her ability to keep a country in burgeon, without tackling dazzling problems.
So to conclude, while there are few examples of leaders, being perceived as highly capable without pompous challenges faced, more often than not, such difficulties are the most palpable and hence are more important for their footprint in history.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-20 | Mateo Chen | 13 | view |
| 2022-12-05 | Jbrachael | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-25 | Thelmacakes | 50 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | alexdipierro24 | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-21 | Prash | 58 | view |
- Progress should be the aim of any great society. People too often cling unnecessarily to obsolete ways of thinking and acting because they enjoy feeling comfortable and fear the unknown. 75
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In de 75
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- The perceived greatness of any political leader has more to do with the challenges faced by that leader than with any of his or her inherent skills and abilities. 66
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...still be perceived as great when showing conscience and other leadership traits. ...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o create his legacy without his inherent reflection skills and his highly strateg...
^^
Line 17, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re often than not, such difficulties are the most palpable and hence are more imp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26729559748 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68778903207 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.3616542213 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.6875 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369247096029 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105841673897 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567922085975 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189860805754 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676302135162 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.