The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
The real talent of a popular musician can be accurately assessed during his working years also. Nowadays, we can see that if a musician is very popular, it means his or her music is liked by a large number of people. I do not agree with the claim till full extent because this is a generalized claim. It might be applicable for a few popular musicians.
In fact, the talented popular musician are mainly praised in days when he or she creates popular music. For example, A. R. Rahman is very popular in India. His music is loved by every one and he has also received an Oscar award. It reflects that a talented popular musician can accurately be assessed accurately before she or he is dead.
In the past and recent year, several awards are given distributed to the talented popular musicians. A popular music does not mean that it should be very accurate, but it is loved by people. A popular musician can be very accurately assessed before he or she is dead. It depends on the people who want to assess the musician. The claim is also valid if the people who should have sufficient knowledge of the area of music they are going to assess. If the number of people available for the assessment of the music is nor adequate, then it might take several year after the musician is dead.
Therefore, it is not necessary that a popular musician can bot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several year.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment 50
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 50
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ately assessed during his working years also. Nowadays, we can see that if a musicia...
^^^^
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
..., it means his or her music is liked by a large number of people. I do not agree with the claim ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... her music is liked by a large number of people. I do not agree with the claim ti...
^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'several years'.
Suggestion: several years
...sic is nor adequate, then it might take several year after the musician is dead. Therefor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...everal year after the musician is dead. Therefore, it is not necessary that a po...
^^^
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'several years'.
Suggestion: several years
...ed until the musician has been dead for several year.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'for example', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.170818505338 0.240241500013 71% => OK
Verbs: 0.188612099644 0.157235817809 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11743772242 0.0880659088768 133% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0640569395018 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0782918149466 0.0444667217837 176% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.113879003559 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0533807829181 0.0406280797675 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.47976305445 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0106761565836 0.030933414821 35% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0960854092527 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0320284697509 0.0249443105267 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106761565836 0.0148568991511 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1426.0 2732.02544248 52% => OK
No of words: 258.0 452.878318584 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52713178295 6.0361032391 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.58838876751 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.313953488372 0.366273622748 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232558139535 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151162790698 0.200843997647 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.077519379845 0.132149295362 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47976305445 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 219.290929204 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.484496124031 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 45.2720521024 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 17.2 23.380412469 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.118005303 59.4972553346 47% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 23.380412469 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.533333333333 0.674092028746 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.21349557522 115% => OK
Readability: 40.4558139535 51.4728631049 79% => OK
Elegance: 1.02150537634 1.64882698954 62% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44000119004 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132909630977 0.123202303941 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.123463871409 0.077325440228 160% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.532979523928 0.547984918172 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.178785407834 0.149214159877 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184976783808 0.161403998019 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111287797349 0.0892212321368 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.372113355916 0.385218514788 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0171100384558 0.0692045440612 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338758882212 0.275328986314 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818321766982 0.0653680567796 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 13.5995575221 44% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.