Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals are a part of history. Since ancient times people are either victims or accused of scandal. The biggest scandal that first came to be known in the history of share market is Mississippi bubble. John was the centre of this scandal. He sold the stocks of French colonised are area in North America. The price of stock sky rocketed artificially by John the minister of finance and Henry Louis the monarch of France. They both hold a major chunk of those stocks. When the first batch of people got to that land in North America most of them died. Very few people returned, back to their country. Rumours started to spread about the stocks and the Mississippi bubble busted. This gave rise to French Revolution and monarchy was overthrown. Exposure of scandal is necessary to bring a change but not to focus attention on problems.
The problems at the first arise due to our negligence. Scandals cannot be useful, but their exposure is necessary. There are lots of scandals in various sectors such as banking, politics, industrial etc. In India the recent major banking scandal was SWIFT system scandal. Approximately 12000 crore rupees where siphoned from public sector Indian bank, with help of bank officials. Many political scandals are not even exposed to people. Large amount of public money is collected in the form of tax is misused. Panama paper scandal is one of them. Where many political names where involved in the scandal.
These scandals cause adverse effects on country’s economic conditions, as public money is exploited by powerful people. The money that’s for public welfare is reached in hands of rich powerful people. This causes, income disparity between rich and poor. Also, the overall political and financial system of country start to fail. Advanced technology, though had helped people also has led to increase in scandals. Data theft scandal, cyber threat to a state’s internal security, online frauds had recently increased. Scandals cannot be means to focus our attention on problems, but analysing the system for possible scandals can be the way to focus on problems.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oth hold a major chunk of those stocks. When the first batch of people got to that l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 548, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d. Panama paper scandal is one of them. Where many political names where involved in ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09169054441 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56078716213 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598853868195 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 23.0359550562 52% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4335932903 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 63.4642857143 118.986275619 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4642857143 23.4991977007 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.17857142857 5.21951772744 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178842974206 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044646529777 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547030152422 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117035181934 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104456995839 0.0667264976115 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.35 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 11.2143820225 61% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.