Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could
The term scandal means to outrage the people by doing something opprobrium. Recently, scandal has become one of the major weapons of the politicians to destroy the opponent and all scandals that we come to know through media are not based on the true events. So, I am not in the favor that the scandals are useful to eradicate problems and I am going to explain my reasons in this discussion.
In the most of the developing countries, one should not consider that scandals are useful due to the attraction of attention because of less ethical values of the people. Though a lot of scandals have been exposed to the nation there is no sign of decreasing of corruptions. Rather it seems that exposing process is encouraging more scandals. For example, in Bangladesh at 2002 Rapid Action Batalion revealed many scandals about the party leaders of that time and many of them were sent to jail for their immense corruption such as Zia Trust corruption. After this phenomenon, police and detective branch became more aware of the corruptions but there are still the trend of corruption is going high unambiguously which proves that the scandals are not useful.
It is true that scandals attract the focus of the nation into the problems but these attentions are not enough to eradicate the problems because the associate authorities are also corrupted and they always try to hide these corruptions. That’s why people of the state should be honest because only some laws, judicial system are not enough to solve the problems. For example, in Bangladesh people offer to take bribes to police and other administrative authorities which indirectly encourages the authorities to become corrupted.
Finally, strict and dispassionate judicial system should be developed and the people should protest against all types of corruptions. It is true that a reformer may not be enough to fight against the corruptions but they can make the nation aware of the problems and persuade them to fight against them. For example, Raja Ram Mohon Ray, a great reformer of the indian history who fought against the “Sotidaho’’ and became successful to eradicate that trend. In that time, he took the help of British authorities and gathered support from the people of the society. Thus he was able to solve the problems being reformer.
In summary, from the above analysis and examples it is lucid that scandals are not useful because it actually encourages more corruptions. To eradicate corruptions from the society people have to come forward and to protest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individual 62
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 58
- In any situation, progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 58
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e of less ethical values of the people. Though a lot of scandals have been exposed to ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...s no sign of decreasing of corruptions. Rather it seems that exposing process is encou...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 581, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...support from the people of the society. Thus he was able to solve the problems being...
^^^^
Line 7, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to solve the problems being reformer. In summary, from the above analysis and ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, may, so, still, thus, for example, in summary, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06855791962 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8964451792 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494089834515 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6251352688 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203293385559 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598088082169 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611121190417 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111244765523 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283972628546 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.