Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
To begin with, scandals are generally known for the events that cause public outrage which is illegal. According to the claim given scandals focus attention that others may not do but they are also chances of diverting the public or misleading them sometimes it may be for the benefit of the people but doing against the law is wrong. For example, Nowadays there are many strikes and other events that are against the law and becoming a disturbance for common people and another example, focusing on a group of people and making the outrage.
Firstly, scandals may focus on the things that others may not but this should be done with the law and without causing disturbance to the society. The great leader Mahatma Gandhi has done a silent rally for freedom is the best example of not letting any public disturbance or causing any violence. So any events or actions that can be done for the necessity of the public can be done without making public outrage and can be done morally with the help of law for the people.
Additionally, nowadays political parties are trying to make the public getting against the government with intention of letting the government down by using the public and hence they are cases where scandals necessarily do not focus on any problems and also causing many lives leading to death there are many strikes that made people to eventually get anger against the government and caused many damages to the society.
To sum it up, scandals not always focus on problems sometimes they might be prejudicial and causing disturbance to society and unnecessary actions. Instead, we can fight for the problems in a peaceful manner and going legally and fight for our rights which can be the better way to make the problem solved easily.
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 43
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 50
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a peaceful manner" with adverb for "peaceful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... Instead, we can fight for the problems in a peaceful manner and going legally and fight for our rig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, may, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 303.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81188118812 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41394720944 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455445544554 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.3473271231 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.0 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6666666667 23.4991977007 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14916786864 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754528861929 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422021882987 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102370317993 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421581189502 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.