Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals are very important in order to grab attention on some problems which might be the impossible onerous task for some reformers and speakers. But they are not always as useful and trust worthy as they seem to appear. So I am not fully convinced with the above statement. I am conditional with the claim made by the author in the above statement.
Scandals represent the illegitimate and illegal events occurring in the society which might be concealed for years if they are not blown out by scandals. Reformers and speakers in most of the corrupted countries with high rate of corruption, they usually aid directly or indirectly the wrong-doer in bringing their inhumanity into practice instead of checking control on these felonies. So when scandals against these felonies break out, then attention on those previously concealed problems become flash out and get the mass attention. For example; recently in Nepal, media and public are relentlessly being against the government who is silent in hot scandal of a girl's rape; Nirmala Panta and people are suspecting government officials themselves being indulged in this scandal. If this event has not happened as scandals, this type of crimes will just burgeon in future without any public attention. But the enormous railing and critics of public and media will definitely helps in fostering some crucial solutions to those problems by government side too. In this way, scandals play a pivotal role in actually visualizing our problems and help in immediate solution for that solutions and aids in providing better direction to the better society.
Scandal assists in identifying crime and criminals and bringing rule of justice in the country. But is it valid for all types of scandals? Do all scandals are essentially useful in providing a better direction to our society? There are several examples of fake scandals which are just attempted to defame someone or get the public attentions. For example; some Medias intentionally creates scandals or buys through a criminal, deliberately scatter those scandals to get public attention, to increase their earning through TRP. Several cases of suicides occurs in India on which most of them is affected due to those scandals which defame their image but media played it illegally just for their earnings. So these types of scandals have not done any good, so they must be wisely checked and controlled. We actually do not know how any scandals are trust worthy without just justifying the credibility of the source. Scandals might play different role of public attention with respect to our awareness on those sources. So, scandals do not play a crucial role in shaping the useful transformation of society in all situations.
Most might argues that any scandals, real or fake, play vital role, are useful. Fake scandals can also helps in finding the real culprit and giving justice to the real victims, so that these fake scandals will be totally checked in the future. But going for good and betterment do not essentially need to get involved in the wrong at least for once too.
From these above paragraph, it is crystal clear that scope of scandals differs with it's nature, society, people. It might be useful to get people attentions on some problems but just getting people attention on all types of issue which might be phony, might not lead to a definitive and good direction.
- Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach. 62
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 50
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for th 83
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 978, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...ics of public and media will definitely helps in fostering some crucial solutions to ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, at least, for example, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2840.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05338078292 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65132735311 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47153024911 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 877.5 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1224455388 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.230769231 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80769230769 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 5.13820224719 311% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209889331856 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630112395016 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463675259289 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121943067381 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478075709198 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.