Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There is a saying, “Truth cannot be hidden, and it will eventually come out, even if we try to hide it with millions of lies”. Sometimes to reveal truth behind a devious act, scandals are required. Scandal helps in bringing some kind of idea about what is going on? Who all are involved? And what actually is the matter?
A scandal does help in bringing out veracious facets that no speaker or reformer can bring out in open. Since the speakers would be interested in bringing such cases to an end maybe because of some political pressure or something like that. They won’t be able to spread light on the topic as much as a scandal would have done. Scandal helps in bringing out the truth by any means necessary and just focusing on the solution rather than taming it. It focus mainly on bringing out the truth and finding a solution.
Scandals reveal most devious truth about a person whom we assume to be naïve or saint. We won’t be able to know true face until and unless scandal breaks out and we can see the real person behind the mask. For example, there are many impostor Swami’s in India who pretend to be saint and follow righteous path and spread wisdom everywhere. These Swami’s indeed turn out to hoodwink every follower by womanizing or following illegal paths. In such cases scandals are a better approach for revealing the truth. In such cases scandals does focus on the problem and helps in finding a solution for it.
Another example of such deceitful acts would be, some high renowned political influential person being involved in hit and run, or in murder case, or in drug case, etc. This person won’t be brought to justice as he has some political background. In such case, a speaker won’t be able to shred as much information or accuse this person for that act. In this scenario, scandal brings out the person who did this wily act and the victim, who is affected by it,
Thus, scandals are useful in bringing out the truth and focus on the solution in a way no reformer or speaker ever could have done.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 50
- "In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge." 16
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'focuses', 'focusses'?
Suggestion: focuses; focusses
...the solution rather than taming it. It focus mainly on bringing out the truth and fi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this Swami' or 'These swamies', 'These swamis'?
Suggestion: This Swami; These swamies; These swamis
...ous path and spread wisdom everywhere. These Swami’s indeed turn out to hoodwink every fol...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.206982543641 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.184538653367 0.157235817809 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0822942643392 0.0880659088768 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0423940149626 0.0497285424764 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0299251870324 0.0444667217837 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.11970074813 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.0598503740648 0.0406280797675 147% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.33156822706 2.79330140395 83% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0249376558603 0.030933414821 81% => OK
Particles: 0.0224438902743 0.0016655270985 1348% => OK
Determiners: 0.104738154613 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0199501246883 0.0249443105267 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0199501246883 0.0148568991511 134% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2060.0 2732.02544248 75% => OK
No of words: 366.0 452.878318584 81% => More words wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62841530055 6.0361032391 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.31693989071 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229508196721 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.150273224044 0.200843997647 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0655737704918 0.132149295362 50% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.33156822706 2.79330140395 83% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 219.290929204 85% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508196721311 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 54.3704732154 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.3 23.380412469 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8712857567 59.4972553346 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 23.380412469 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.35 0.674092028746 52% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 41.2508196721 51.4728631049 80% => OK
Elegance: 1.50485436893 1.64882698954 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364419079368 0.391690518653 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.119165004395 0.123202303941 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.114739358746 0.077325440228 148% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48609188235 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156264780529 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130559433566 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730593500533 0.0892212321368 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.290909249795 0.385218514788 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0719598467486 0.0692045440612 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262143723408 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092152629057 0.0653680567796 141% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.4325221239 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.66592920354 218% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.