Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
As stated that scandals are used in determing our attention on problems. The result of these scandals is outrage of the public. Due to these scandals people involved in these are able to find the solution for existing problems. It is ideally believed that practical approach gives precise output. Thinking about the problems which occur in future and even though results for it are fruitful the practicallity gives us more exposure to the society.
Reformers are there to tell us about the the problems that occur in the future which helps in predicting them in advance. As the scandals involve practical approachability and one can easily get over it. These scandals improve our indivduality. Scandals in politics, academics, business organization etc where many individuals are involved in solving the problems practically.
Here comes the question, Is practical approach is better than reconizing the problem that occurs in future. Reformers or speakers helps us in giving speech about the future problem not about the existing practical problems. In this situation scandals are derogatory which abates the problem. It is not all about the practical approach but also the attitude of the society towards these reformities.
Conclusively, scandals are important in focussing of the problems and attitude of the society towards these scandals. Even reformers are also used but less when compared to scandals.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 41
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archa 50
- Science is meaningless without religion. 58
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 16
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
As stated that scandals are used in determ...
^^
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
.... Reformers are there to tell us about the the problems that occur in the future which...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
.... Reformers are there to tell us about the the problems that occur in the future which...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...than reconizing the problem that occurs in future. Reformers or speakers helps us in givi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 399, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the society towards these reformities. Conclusively, scandals are important in ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236514522822 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.174273858921 0.157235817809 111% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0622406639004 0.0880659088768 71% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580912863071 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0414937759336 0.0444667217837 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141078838174 0.12292977631 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0622406639004 0.0406280797675 153% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82975038068 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0207468879668 0.030933414821 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.120331950207 0.0997080785238 121% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00414937759336 0.0249443105267 17% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0290456431535 0.0148568991511 196% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1411.0 2732.02544248 52% => OK
No of words: 222.0 452.878318584 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.35585585586 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.58838876751 84% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.418918918919 0.366273622748 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.36036036036 0.280924506359 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.288288288288 0.200843997647 144% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144144144144 0.132149295362 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82975038068 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 219.290929204 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504504504505 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 45.3103978819 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 14.8 23.380412469 63% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.544393921 59.4972553346 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 141.124799967 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8 23.380412469 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 0.674092028746 30% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 50.836036036 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 1.60606060606 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191833096529 0.391690518653 49% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127204688911 0.123202303941 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.128130978576 0.077325440228 166% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.542670929272 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.162291012138 0.149214159877 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102416978796 0.161403998019 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841071621327 0.0892212321368 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.43980595596 0.385218514788 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0885917948065 0.0692045440612 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15479599717 0.275328986314 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448706997953 0.0653680567796 69% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.4325221239 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.30420353982 226% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 7.22455752212 14% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 12.0 3.66592920354 327% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.