Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents
The idea of sorting a child into a path has been a feature of many fictional societies for many years now. The overarching idea is an early analysis of the child’s brain used to sort them into career paths they will be trained to adopt later in life. Such changes to society could have many benefits. For starters, by funnelling people into careers they are suited to from birth has the potential to reduce unemployment rates drastically, which has great implications for any society on a totalitarian level. This could also progress many fields at an astronomical rate. While this all sounds good on paper, do these possible boons outweigh the inescapable drawbacks of such a society? Two glaring weaknesses in such a setup are that the individuals’ feelings are not accounted for when choosing their career, and the class system that would no doubt become entrenched over the years following its implementation.
To their credit, the fictional societies where such measures are implemented are often ridiculously advanced. By streamlining someone’s early development towards a particular career, these individuals are set up for the theoretically easiest transition into the working world. This eliminates a lot of the pressures and decision making from their lives up until that point and minimises the risk of “wrong” career choices in one’s life. A quick inspection of the bigger picture makes it obvious: by directing everyone to jobs according to their ability and talents, the risk of unemployment for everyone goes down. Reducing unemployment has several effects on society, including increasing GDP per capita, reducing crime and improving overall quality of life. Secondly, such a system would increase the talent concentration in certain fields, like medicine and natural sciences. By doing this, it can improve the timeline of several breakthroughs and accelerate the amelioration of several pestilences that haunt society today. These are huge boons for such a system, but are they worth it?
While on paper, it would be great to choose jobs for people based on their perceived talents, human beings are just not that simple. Much more goes (or should go) into choosing a profession that what someone is good at. A system like that cannot possibly consider an individual’s feelings about a certain field far into the future of their life or where their interests and passions lie. This can lead to job dissatisfaction in many instances, which can have adverse effects on one’s mental health. Negatively affecting someone’s mental health like this has been shown to decrease their productivity on several accounts and has even been postulated to increase instance of physical diseases as well. Given that increased productivity is one of the major boons of the proposed situation, this fact is a heavy blow against instituting such a system. Additionally, it is in humans’ nature to compare ourselves to those people we share space with. In the overwhelmingly capitalist society we live in, certain careers cannot be paid the same way; someone who is classed as a doctor will make more, on average, than a hairdresser or a teacher. Classing people in any form, by any metric, has always led to rampant discrimination and infringement of the rights of those on the wrong side of the walls we build between ourselves. A society like the one suggested would only entrench issues of wealth distribution and classism we currently struggle with, at best shuffling the names of the one percent around. Is the progress worth it? Does it benefit us to progress the economy and the sciences at the risk of endangering the mental health of some and the rights of others?
So, is such a society doomed to fail, or is there a way to implement the streamlining while keeping a high standard of health and civil liberty? I do not think so. The measures that would have to be put in place to account for personal biases, while still fundamentally driving everyone to a career based on their talents would just replicate the society we have today. Any deviation towards such a setup could be detrimental for many people in the long run, and such risk, even in the name of progress, in unacceptable.
In conclusion, a society where people’s careers are determined by an outside party based on their talents and aptitudes, works amazingly on paper. An ideal situation would portray a utopia with record lows in unemployment and record highs for productivity and standard of living. However, in practice, such a fantastical community is just that: a fantasy. In reality, humans have many more facets involved in their decision making, and ignoring this can lead to adversely affected mental health. Additionally, sorting a society into boxes based on ability can only lead to discrimination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | josow | 66 | view |
| 2024-07-27 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 70 | view |
| 2024-07-27 | qsdzlbnwtpzecdeugi | 62 | view |
| 2024-04-18 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2024-02-13 | Tammy__kk | 79 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'theoretically the easiest'.
Suggestion: theoretically the easiest
...r, these individuals are set up for the theoretically easiest transition into the working world. This...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 116.0 58.6224719101 198% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4027.0 2235.4752809 180% => OK
No of words: 789.0 442.535393258 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10392902408 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.29991922678 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90039779616 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 388.0 215.323595506 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491761723701 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1263.6 704.065955056 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7872210402 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.861111111 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47222222222 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214294491954 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489838715075 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037576767829 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127646642844 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144185099829 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 196.0 100.480337079 195% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 221, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'theoretically the easiest'.
Suggestion: theoretically the easiest
...r, these individuals are set up for the theoretically easiest transition into the working world. This...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 116.0 58.6224719101 198% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4027.0 2235.4752809 180% => OK
No of words: 789.0 442.535393258 178% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10392902408 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.29991922678 4.55969084622 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90039779616 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 388.0 215.323595506 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491761723701 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1263.6 704.065955056 179% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 36.0 20.2370786517 178% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7872210402 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.861111111 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.47222222222 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 24.0 10.2758426966 234% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214294491954 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0489838715075 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037576767829 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127646642844 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144185099829 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 196.0 100.480337079 195% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.