Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
While some might disagree with the statement that society should save endangered species only if human activities had caused it, I support the statement due to the following reasons.
Since billion years ago when the first living creature exist in this planet, natural selection has been playing the role of God. If a species has some disadvantages and cannot survive in its environment, it will become extinct and other species that are more developed in suiting the environment will survive, and this is natural selection. The reason why natural selection exist in our world is because it provides better gene passing on in this world, and only the strong can survive in the future. We, human, are not God, we should not decide what species that should or should not survive due to our own preference. Hene, we should not save make effort to save endangered species that the reason of extinction are not caused by humans.
Second reason why society should not make effort to save endangered species is that it is not practical. Currently, there are ten of thousands of species are close to extinction, and it would take hundreds of billions of dollars to save those species. For example, setting up animal protection program requires scientists, animal doctors, different equipment, a land or area that contains the animal and many more. Saving one species can cause a large sum of money and we do not have enough funds or human resources to save all the endangered animals at the same time. Unfortunately, we would have to make a choice between saving certain species first than others. This is why I believe that society should only save the almost extinct species that are caused by human activities.
Last, some might argue that it is necessary to protect endangered animals that the reasons of extinction are caused by humans due to saving animal diversity. It is true that animal diversity is indeed important, however, if we do not have enough funds to do so, it is still not possible to save all endangered species. It is better to save some than to ending up not able to save all.
In conclusion, I agree with the statement that society should only save endangered species only if the reason for extinction is caused by human activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- The president of Grove College has recommended that the college abandon its century-old tradition of all-female education and begin admitting men. Pointing to other all-female colleges that experienced an increase in applications after adopting coeducatio 38
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. Write a response in which you discuss 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities.Recently, we signed a contract with the Fly-Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse 73
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities. 50
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...due to the following reasons. Since billion years ago when the first living creatur...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 385.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87792207792 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56045144864 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.449350649351 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8222607501 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.375 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485115385925 0.243740707755 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195523723598 0.0831039109588 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155106555371 0.0758088955206 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315837587113 0.150359130593 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122022976139 0.0667264976115 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.