Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
When it comes to the issue the importance of preservation endangered species, some people believe that we have an obligation to protect not only endangered species, but also whole creatures. However, others have the opposite view. As far as I am concerned, the former point carries more weight. I take this position on account of the following reasons.
To illustrate my position, let us to take a look on why some people dislike the idea of protection of species. To preserve the nature and species, we need pay much money for researches and employees, while most countries have not a proper economic condition. The rate of unemployment is a trouble crisis not only in the poor country but also in the developed Western countries. So, governments should pay more attention important predicaments, which affects people’s life directly.
Although, I admit that we have to spend much money for protect species, I believe that advantages of this project are apparent. The first reason is that our survival depends on the nature and species. Every species have a certain role to keep balance the nature, and extinction each of them can disrupt the life cycle. Hence, we have to preserve all animals in order to maintain our survival. I think that a small example can give some light to this matter. As we all know, the oceans and sea in a great resource of foods, and a great part of humans’ foods are depending on it. Nonetheless, over-fishing leads to plenty of fishes are at the risk of extinction, and sooner or later; we will be witnessing many people die because of harvesting. Although some people think that we must protect of certain kinds of animal and planets, they ignore that all creatures in the world are in the food chain, and eliminating one of the definitely affects others survival negatively.
A further point we must consider is that human have an ethical duty to protect on the nature, because they are reprehensible in animals’ extinction. Some people say that several extinctions were happened in the history of the Earth, so it is a common process and we should not interfere in it. However, they ignore that the scenario is different in the recent age. After industrial revolution, human activities had increased so tremendously that nature is not able to restore itself. Ozone depletion, air and water pollution, soil erosion, and even deforestation are a small part of human’s effective on the nature and species. From the moral angle, human have to preserve the nature and species in order to compensate their past mistakes.
All above evidence supports this undeniable that we should protect other species because our survival depends on them, and also it is a moral responsible. Of course, as an English proverbs goes “a coin has two sides”; therefore, those who have the opposite view partially reasonable that this project surely is expensive. Nevertheless, I think that its profits outweigh dangerous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Manoj Gyawali | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 54 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Caveira meyona | 62 | view |
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition. 16
- TPO-41 - Integrated Writing Task Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harm 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Modern technology is creating a single world culture Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 74
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby East 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: EACH_EVERY_NNS[1]
Message: 'Each' and 'every' are used with singular. Did you mean 'all'?
Suggestion: All
...ival depends on the nature and species. Every species have a certain role to keep bal...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 563, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... and a great part of humans' foods are depending on it. Nonetheless, over-fishing leads ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'nevertheless', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'i think', 'of course']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.235087719298 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.135087719298 0.157235817809 86% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0982456140351 0.0880659088768 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0456140350877 0.0497285424764 92% => OK
Pronouns: 0.059649122807 0.0444667217837 134% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.115789473684 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0122807017544 0.0406280797675 30% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.86339628254 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0263157894737 0.030933414821 85% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.10350877193 0.0997080785238 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0140350877193 0.0249443105267 56% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00701754385965 0.0148568991511 47% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2973.0 2732.02544248 109% => OK
No of words: 492.0 452.878318584 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04268292683 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367886178862 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294715447154 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201219512195 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136178861789 0.132149295362 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86339628254 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 219.290929204 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524390243902 0.48968727796 107% => OK
Word variations: 62.56782673 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.68 23.380412469 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3620534489 59.4972553346 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.92 141.124799967 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.68 23.380412469 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.56 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 49.1515447154 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.51094890511 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383449445114 0.391690518653 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0905706448033 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0700526695066 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.47514738999 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.118635267422 0.149214159877 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139167908569 0.161403998019 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772876300167 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.395632251926 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.105959837607 0.0692045440612 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265720234419 0.275328986314 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0649688921698 0.0653680567796 99% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.