Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Taking up a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field is not unheard of. Availability of jobs in a particular field of study give enough impetuous to students to purse it. But considering a field of study without any real interest or liking for that field, even when there is a lot of job opportunity, if not immediately, creates problems and dissatisfaction in the long run.
In today’s competitive world, earning your bread and butter with a job is the basis of survival. Getting a good job has become the primary objective of taking up any course or field of study. No doubt, the availability of god job in the chosen field should be top on priority list of students, not only because it will help them get solvent but also because they can put their knowledge into practical use. Sometimes students have an idea of the job they want to do but unaware of the right field of study they have to purse. In these cases, choosing the field of study for the desired job is required. Many at times, a good job prospect at the end of the line, help student build up the required interest and talent. Moreover, when a student chooses a field without any job prospect, at the end of the day when he see his peers getting jobs while he is clueless with what to do with the amount of knowledge in the field when there is no real job, it gets frustrating.
But, taking up a field of study solely on this one criterion of whether jobs are available in this field or not, is not sufficient to embark on a fulfilling career. If the student chooses a field of study that he is not really interested in, and neither he is talented enough for it, then it will be very difficult for him to sustain his career in this field in long run. For example, it is seen that most students take up engineering because of the good job prospect in the field, but once they start the course, many realise that they have no real interest in the field and end of leaving the field even after getting a job. Another example can be that of taking up medicine as the field of study, here the job prospect is very good but if a student dives into it without the talent and interest, it will be difficult for him to keep up the motivation required for the rigorous study. Before even getting the job he is surely to fail. Moreover, taking up a field without interest and talent will make the student, a mere mediocre. He/she can never achieve the level of excellence a motivated and talented student can reach.
Finally, as it can be seen that, despite the many advantages of choosing a field of study with availability of job, it can never be equivalent to taking up a course where your talent and interest lies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | kevlarpeng | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper."In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government c 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of jobs'.
Suggestion: a lot of jobs
...king for that field, even when there is a lot of job opportunity, if not immediately, create...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...e availability of god job in the chosen field should be top on priority list of stude...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 820, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'sees'.
Suggestion: sees
...prospect, at the end of the day when he see his peers getting jobs while he is clue...
^^^
Line 3, column 889, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...vation required for the rigorous study. Before even getting the job he is surely to fa...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'moreover', 'really', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for example', 'no doubt']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228102189781 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.138686131387 0.157235817809 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0656934306569 0.0880659088768 75% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0510948905109 0.0497285424764 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0510948905109 0.0444667217837 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.155109489051 0.12292977631 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0456204379562 0.0406280797675 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49659848594 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0182481751825 0.030933414821 59% => OK
Particles: 0.0164233576642 0.0016655270985 986% => OK
Determiners: 0.118613138686 0.0997080785238 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0200729927007 0.0249443105267 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0109489051095 0.0148568991511 74% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2701.0 2732.02544248 99% => OK
No of words: 500.0 452.878318584 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.402 6.0361032391 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.276 0.366273622748 75% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.202 0.280924506359 72% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.128 0.200843997647 64% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.078 0.132149295362 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49659848594 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 219.290929204 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.404 0.48968727796 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.6492375572 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.7777777778 23.380412469 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6671227863 59.4972553346 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.055555556 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7777777778 23.380412469 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.611111111111 0.674092028746 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 47.9777777778 51.4728631049 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.7803030303 1.64882698954 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424850020792 0.391690518653 108% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.156255038375 0.123202303941 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0930871291021 0.077325440228 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.607418569804 0.547984918172 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.165988612105 0.149214159877 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212896197059 0.161403998019 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103790130272 0.0892212321368 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.563233514785 0.385218514788 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.10162851368 0.0692045440612 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.35042038172 0.275328986314 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832526784479 0.0653680567796 127% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.