Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
It’s not uncommon nowadays to open TV or newspaper and find a new scandal making it to the headlines. Be it politics, sports or academia, every field has its fair share of scandals and with a few exceptions it can be seen that at large they indeed have helped focus our attention on issues and problems no speaker or reformer ever could.
On one hand scandals are often instrumental in undermining the public’s faith in an institution or organisation. It defames the concerned organisation or person and sometimes it’s a whole nation that is at the receiving end of a scandal. For example in the commonwealth games Delhi 2010, the corruption scandal concerning the organising committee not only damage the reputation of the India Olympic association but brought about a bad name to the entire nation.
Also sometimes scandal are deliberately concocted to divert public attentions and they play at the hands of media that cash on this opportunity to earn more viewership. Nowadays when a scandal breaks out, it receives immense media attention and the public also follow intones of the scandal diligently as the public’s eyes and ears are the media. The newsrooms are converted into virtual courtrooms where the newsreaders with their panel gives our verdict. They tend to carry on with the story at the cost of more important issues just to keep the audience glued. For example when the Monika Lewinsky and Bill Clinton sex scandal broke out, the media went into frenzy and followed up the story for one whole year at the cost of more important national as well international issues.
But scandals does help focus our attention on issues that we tend to neglect and it does force government, other concerned authorities to take appropriate action. For example when the 2G spectrum allocation scandal broke out in India, it enlightened the public of the discrepancies in the spectrum allocation and exposed the corruptions going on in the telecommunication sector. This was followed by an immediate resignation of the concerned minister and indictment of all the people involved. Many at times scandals have helped the government or the governing body of an organisation to identify loop holes in the existing laws, rules and regulations so as to make amendments and bring about a more solid and impregnable system. One such case in India was the Satyam corporate scandal where the company admitted of falsifying the accounts. After this scandal many stringent laws were passed and the power of chartered accountants clipped so that no company can feign its accounts in future. More recently, doping scandals in the sports arena led to stricter doping tests and career ending punishment for defaulters. The list of scandals with such big implications to the existing laws and to the society as a whole is very long.
Although it is true that sometimes scandals deviate the public’s attention from more important and vital societal issues and bogs down progress but the positive reforms that have come across due to various scandals breaking out cannot be denied. Many at times the voices of reformers are gagged but scandals are too loud to be silenced and so they are necessary to pinpoint issues and problems of the society.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of Parson City's local newspaper."In our region of Trillura, the majority of money spent on the schools that most students attend—the city-run public schools—comes from taxes that each city government c 50
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 58
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...bout a bad name to the entire nation. Also sometimes scandal are deliberately conc...
^^^^
Line 5, column 653, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...he existing laws, rules and regulations so as to make amendments and bring about a more ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 983, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... that no company can feign its accounts in future. More recently, doping scandals in the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1032, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
.... More recently, doping scandals in the sports arena led to stricter doping tests and ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the society as a whole is very long. Although it is true that sometimes scand...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265306122449 0.240241500013 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.156462585034 0.157235817809 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0799319727891 0.0880659088768 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0425170068027 0.0497285424764 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0374149659864 0.0444667217837 84% => OK
Prepositions: 0.107142857143 0.12292977631 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0442176870748 0.0406280797675 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85079034117 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0289115646259 0.030933414821 93% => OK
Particles: 0.0136054421769 0.0016655270985 817% => OK
Determiners: 0.110544217687 0.0997080785238 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00680272108844 0.0249443105267 27% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.0136054421769 0.0148568991511 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3259.0 2732.02544248 119% => OK
No of words: 538.0 452.878318584 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.05762081784 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81610080973 4.58838876751 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.35687732342 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28624535316 0.280924506359 102% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.219330855019 0.200843997647 109% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144981412639 0.132149295362 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85079034117 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 219.290929204 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511152416357 0.48968727796 104% => OK
Word variations: 62.0058727279 55.4138127331 112% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 26.9 23.380412469 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8432292293 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.95 141.124799967 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 23.380412469 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.674092028746 59% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 55.524535316 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.76258992806 1.64882698954 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347590234376 0.391690518653 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115547413604 0.123202303941 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0625772961612 0.077325440228 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.598691818623 0.547984918172 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131065217939 0.149214159877 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155403429032 0.161403998019 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479287895758 0.0892212321368 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.43911772552 0.385218514788 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.130095798712 0.0692045440612 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247402735612 0.275328986314 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0364750861141 0.0653680567796 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.4325221239 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.30420353982 283% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 15.0 3.66592920354 409% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 18.0 13.5995575221 132% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.