Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
The author gives two different viewpoints regarding the needs of government funding for arts. Some people believe that government funding of arts could threaten the integrity of arts since while depending on funding by the government various interference could result. This could be true somehow but funding from government is much necessary to ensure arts be available to all kinds of people, preserved and flourish.
Arts add value to mundane life of human, and it keeps similar significance in today’s world which is dominated by science and economies. However, field of arts require thriving in today’s context. Due to various reasons people are losing interest in arts and few who remained have to struggle. Hence, attention to this field is required. Constant funding is inevitable factor so that one could learn, explore, pursue and follow the sector of arts, which should be available to all kinds of people. For example, funding is necessary in schools of arts, and support students who want to pursue their field and support them. People who make their living from arts should be ensured to make for sufficient living. It should also be with the reach of general public who wish to explore them. Hence, funding becomes necessary to keep the field thriving and to help art flourish.
It is also believed that while depending on government for funding of the arts, it may threaten the integrity of arts. While government does the funding there could be interference that go against the integrity of arts. For example, government officials may do politics and could have certain preferences that could favor certain art school or agencies that align with their self- interests. In such case impartiality may arise and thus integrity is hindered. So from this viewpoint, arts sector should be make pollution free from any kind of impartiality and politics. However, these circumstance may not always arise. Funding from persons or other private companies could be beneficial but even when private may provide funding, similar situation may arise. Moreover, private funding cannot be ensured every time. The art school or agency must itself be committed to maintain its integrity.
Funding is always essential for any industry and especially for an art industry because there is less funding in arts sector at present context. Funding is more concentrated in “STEM”. Ensuring proper funding and support focusing to keep the arts flourishing and also maintaining its integrity is necessary. On the other hand, to keep the art industry undiluted funding agencies need to be keep in check so that they work without impartiality. Art agencies should itself be committed to be free of politics. Funding may not be always enough so alternative support should be discovered to keep the sector vivacious and flourishing. Hence, maintaining the integrity of arts, I agree that the government should ensure reasonable funding of arts.
- Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of traffic Opponents 77
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 82
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 66
- Students do not respect teachers as much as they did in the past 70
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ng. It should also be with the reach of general public who wish to explore them. Hence, fundin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... it may threaten the integrity of arts. While government does the funding there could...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'made'?
Suggestion: made
...m this viewpoint, arts sector should be make pollution free from any kind of imparti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2476.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23467230444 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68623766161 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435517970402 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1520019803 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4285714286 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8928571429 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03571428571 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506576081699 0.243740707755 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14574752558 0.0831039109588 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1097351172 0.0758088955206 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370320595423 0.150359130593 246% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12280853679 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.