Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
generally speaking, a change in lifestyle could lead to a more sustainable environment. By reducing energy consumption, the market would meet a shortage in the demands of energy. As a result, less energy would be produced, hence the climate change could be mitigated. however, things don't always go like that way. changing the lifestyle of people who live in developed nations is not a top priority for solving the global climate change problem.
First, it is hardly promising to contain climate change by reducing the energy consumption of individuals. The reasons are various. it is the large emission of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, not the energy consumed, that caused climate change. Admittedly, energy is highly related to carbon dioxide emission, but energy can be used safely as lone as generated in clean methods such as solar and wind energy. What's more, even if reducing energy consumption can effectively slow the procedure of climate change, the difficulty we encountered when trying to quantify the damage caused by energy-consuming activities make this argument less practical. For example, it is not clear how much energy will be consumed when we open our PC and watch a piece of video on the internet, because we don't know how many computations have been made to supply an intellectual daily recommendation for us, and how many servers are running to make sure that we can watch this video anywhere at any time. The actual energy consumed behind a simple click could be huge. so reducing energy consumption is neither likely to be effective--because it's an indirect cause--nor likely to be practical.
Second, global climate change is not only caused by developed countries. Instead, but also developing ones. A developing country like China is a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions. climate change is a global issue, and the climate problem requires collaborative efforts across the world. it is not likely to contain climate change until the majority of countries are determined to make a difference.
Furthermore, international companies as well as big factories, which consume huge quantities of energy, are much more vital to climate change than individuals. These huge monsters swallow tones of fossil fuels every day. The solution for them, however, is switching to an environmentally friendly industry system by technological innovation, so that they could produce fewer greenhouse gases for each unit of energy they use.
To put it in a nutshell, changing the lifestyle of people who live in developed nations can only help containing global climate change in a limited way. so it should no be in first priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-05 | Jeet Thkaur | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | bhavna288 | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
| 2021-08-29 | ulligadda sreeja | 50 | view |
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence for global climate change Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are u 66
- Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle given the evidence for global climate change Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are u 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Generally
generally speaking, a change in lifestyle could l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... the climate change could be mitigated. however, things dont always go like that way. c...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nge could be mitigated. however, things dont always go like that way. changing the l...
^^^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Changing
...r, things dont always go like that way. changing the lifestyle of people who live in dev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...al climate change problem. First, it is hardly promising to contain climate change by reducing t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f individuals. The reasons are various. it is the large emission of greenhouse gas...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... methods such as solar and wind energy. Whats more, even if reducing energy consumpti...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ce of video on the internet, because we dont know how many computations have been ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1059, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ed behind a simple click could be huge. so reducing energy consumption is neither ...
^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Climate
...ontributor to carbon dioxide emissions. climate change is a global issue, and the clima...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...collaborative efforts across the world. it is not likely to contain climate change...
^^
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to contain' or 'contain'.
Suggestion: to contain; contain
...live in developed nations can only help containing global climate change in a limited way....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a limited way" with adverb for "limited"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y help containing global climate change in a limited way. so it should no be in first priority. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...global climate change in a limited way. so it should no be in first priority.
^^
Line 9, column 167, Rule ID: NOW[3]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...e change in a limited way. so it should no be in first priority.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, so, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22093023256 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97165353231 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525581395349 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.5314419959 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6086956522 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6956521739 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335788790612 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100364156379 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992566668074 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208110367574 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860550889577 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.