Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.
The author states that the progress of the technology is complicating our lives when it is intended to simplify our lives. this statement is a stretch and should be substantiated. I think technology is not making our lives complex and I disagree with the author's statement.
In the 17th century, the main focus to improve the lives of mankind and focused more on technology, which led to increase in the industries. The motto of the industrial rise is to make products and tools which will enhance the human standard of living. many examples from the past shows technology simplified the lives of human. For example, the invention of telephone eased the process of communication. The invention of flight by Right brothers eased the travelling long distances. there are countless examples to show how technology improved the human standard of living.
While the intention -- in the invention and new research in the feild of technology -- is to ease the lives of the mankind, there are few cases where we have adverse effects of technology. To illustrate, invention of combustion engine -- which uses petroleum products -- made commuting easier, but the harmful gases released during combustion has deleterious affects on the environment. this is a problem that has arised due to a technological invention. there are several examples ranging from invention of polyethene bags -- made of a chemical substance polyehthe which is not eco-friendly-- to invention of missiles, which have very harmful affects.
Scientists and many researchers are continuously working in crubing these adverse affects by coming up with eco-friendly alternatives. From the above mentioned illustrations, instead of combustion engines we have electric vehicles which runs on electric power; instead of using polyethene bags for carrying products we have other alternatives like paper bags and colth bags.
In conclusion, instead of having a apprehensive look towards the technology, it is better to have postive outlook towards it. Hence, I do not agree with the author's statement as technology have both positive and negative sides, the former is outrightly weighed more. researchers are always striving to improve the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | Siddiqur Rahman | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | phajaygv | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Evil-wasp | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-29 | xipaheje | 16 | view |
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 50
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated. 66
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 55
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere 55
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...n it is intended to simplify our lives. this statement is a stretch and should be su...
^^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...r lives complex and I disagree with the authors statement. In the 17th century, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
... statement. In the 17th century, the main focus to improve the lives of mankind and foc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...l enhance the human standard of living. many examples from the past shows technology...
^^^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'shows'' or 'show's'?
Suggestion: shows'; show's
... of living. many examples from the past shows technology simplified the lives of huma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...rs eased the travelling long distances. there are countless examples to show how tech...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...deleterious affects on the environment. this is a problem that has arised due to a t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...rised due to a technological invention. there are several examples ranging from inven...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...gs. In conclusion, instead of having a apprehensive look towards the technolog...
^
Line 9, column 158, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ards it. Hence, I do not agree with the authors statement as technology have both posit...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 268, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Researchers
... the former is outrightly weighed more. researchers are always striving to improve the situ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, then, while, for example, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 345.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42028985507 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03327935962 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542028985507 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.7225441976 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159924200981 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518013267225 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849244490514 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933365804259 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101265762079 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.