Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
It is truly difficult to maintain a healthy balance between self-confidence and accepting criticisms. In fact, people continuously argue whether one should weight more on listening to and accommodating upon criticism and feedback – no matter how harsh and bitter – or vice versa. Despite the vehement outcry supporting that one should trust self more than anyone else, it is irrefutable that being more open-minded and attentive to other’s feedback and criticism significantly improves one’s work to become not only more objective and impartial, but also prepare one for all possible objections moving forward.
It is not entirely wrong to be tenacious and self-supportive with our own ideas and opinions. The more human civilization develop, the greater emphasis has been put on self-acknowledgement as well as self-promoted well-being. In this overflowing pot of diverse and immense voices today, it is a powerful strength to be able to stick up for own, regardless of what others say and do. Such stubborn attitude is how Amazon accomplished its current eminence; the founder tenaciously launched his start up of “buy and deliver groceries for other people and get commission from it”, which many people around him at the time considered to be completely pointless and questionable.
All human ideas and opinions are subjected to more than one side of perspective and so are subjected to criticism and questions. One should realize the fact that not all criticism and questions are negative and admonishing. Listening to criticism and accommodating the weaknesses upon raised questions refines the product to be more objective in multiple aspects and bulletproof to common doubts. The power of criticism and endless questioning is already entrenched in the work system of the top ranked companies. Google, one of the most successful and progressive company today, even have a sector specialized in only raising questions, objections, and criticism to any reviewed projects. The team effectively points out the project’s flaws and weaknesses in various cultural, analytical, and ethical aspect, eventually resulting in the evaluated project to become as flawless as it can be.
Furthermore, no matter how innovative the idea is, the work must present comprehensive social and ethical validity in order to achieve its lasting legacy. However, there is a limit to how successfully an individual can acquire the very objective stance in complex social and ethical standards. Therefore, an individual must communicate with others on social and ethical questions and criticism toward her work in order to align with prevailing values. Regardless of how much humans can learn from and how groundbreaking the inhumane era of Nazis is in the entire human history, no one considers Adolf Hitler as the successful and tenacious individual who left the lasting “legacy”.
Hence, although sticking to own may pay off in some cases, one can definitely benefit from receiving and reacting to other opinions and questions in order to refine itself to dismiss common doubts and acquire social and ethical objectivity; the key features of lasting legacy.
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 70
- Recent incursions by deep-sea fishermen into the habitat of the Madagascan shrimp have led to a significant reduction in the species population. With the breeding season fast approaching, the number of shrimp should soon begin to increase. Nonetheless, th 74
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 74
- The following is from a memo from the advertising director of the Super screen Movie Production Company. According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other 34
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 83
Comments
Is this written in the 30
Is this written in the 30 minute time limit?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dback – no matter how harsh and bitter – or vice versa. Despite the vehement outc...
^^^
Line 4, column 470, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...th prevailing values. Regardless of how much humans can learn from and how groundbre...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in fact, as well as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 38.0 14.8657303371 256% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2689.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44331983806 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18615315062 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554655870445 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 855.0 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5455486234 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.388888889 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4444444444 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172305045847 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506639545474 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390942241809 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949666714533 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030510520746 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 100.480337079 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.