Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study
For a University to prosperous, it is very important that the students studying there must outperform. This can be possible only if they understand their true potential. I strongly feel that Universities must encourage its students to participate in courses outside their comfort zone. This will definitely help them scrutinize their interests.
Firstly, I believe that we as students take up courses due to peer pressure, job availability in that arena, parent's choice etc. We never focus what we truly want. It is the responsibility of a good university to help its students introspect and then decide their course. Also, studying courses different from their field of study will help them understand if their choice was right or wrong.
Secondly, indulging in different courses may help the student to form a link and understand the reasoning and logics from an all together different perspective. This may also prove to be a kind of recreation for him/her. For instance, my friend took economics as an extra subject being a science student. This helped her to build a logical mind. Moreover, a wide range of opportunities were opened for her.
Last but not the least, having the knowledge of different fields apart from our own field of interest is never a drawback. Knowledge is never wasted. It will definitely help the student in the time when it is least expected.
To conclude, I would strongly stand by my opinion that universities should encourage its students to get into other courses outside the one of their own interest.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study 50
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 18
- people's behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 255.0 442.535393258 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8374005681 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58431372549 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5814146017 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.8823529412 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28141126223 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840222763189 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818779149606 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162047887548 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582082370948 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.