The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares average house prices in five different cities during a period of 13 years from 1989. On the whole, it can clearly be seen that the costs of average home decreased between 1990 and 1995, while on the other hand, the prices in most of cities increased from 1996 to 2002. In addition, London experienced the greatest average price over the 13-year period.
To begin with, over the 5 years after 189, the costs in Tokyo and London fell significantly by 7% in comparison with 1989 average, whereas New York house prices saw a drop by 5% at the same time. By contrast, average home exp...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-29 | albertonian | 73 | view |
| 2016-07-28 | Daniel2016 | 78 | view |
| 2014-11-27 | indermann91@ymail.com | 80 | view |
| 2014-05-16 | kya | 80 | view |
| 2014-05-12 | kaj | 60 | view |
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 70
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in1999 63
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity,improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 186 200
No. of Characters: 819 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.693 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.403 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.354 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.919 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.452 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.607 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4