1. The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality, both actual and target (what actually happened compared to what the company was trying to achieve), and the number of complaints and passengers.
The graphs demonstrate the percent of buses that served on time, both in reality and the company goals during the period 1999 to 2003. And the average number of complaints every a thousand customers.
Overall, the percentage of expected on time services tend to be higher than in the real life, and the standard is drop through years. While the number of complaints have an increased trend year by year.
In 1999 and 2000, the company on time target were the highest at 86% which is different in real life at 85% in 1999 and remarkable low in 2000 at 82%. In the next 2 years, in 2001 and 2002, they standardized on time services rate at 85% and the actual numbers were close to what have been expected, just lower by half to one percent. The goal is lowered by half percent the following year which is the only year that the actual percent have passed what is expected. On the other hand, the number of complaints were risen, from 70 to 100 passengers in the year of 2000. It dropped a bit in 2001 and started to increased gradually from over 80 cases to 120 cases in 2003.
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 61
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in sea What are the reasons and solutions 56
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 61
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the graph below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Team activities can teach more skills for life than those activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and the standard is drop through years. While the number of complaints have an increa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.405 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31339036913 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1563818795 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156032908457 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637441131195 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374263103597 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0984617539953 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434471758349 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.