The line graph illustrates the amount of goods carried by various means of transport (Road water rail and pipeline) in the United Kingdom from 1974 to 2002.
Overall, Roadways contributed towards the majority of transport during the entire period, whereas pipeline was least used. Goods transportation by road, water and pipeline showed a rise, while railways fluctuated to start and end at the same level.
In terms of transport through road, around 70 millions tonnes of commodities were transported in 1974 . It gradually increased with minor decline in between to reach a high of just below hundred million tonnes in 2002.
Waterways amounted to below 40 millions tons of goods carriage at the start, after which it slightly increased to equal railway in 1978 at 40 millions tons. Following this, it showed persistent growth to become the second major contributor by transporting just below 70 millions tonnes of goods in 2002. Similar trend was followed by pipeline starting at around 5 to reach above 20 million tonnes in the final year.
Approximately 40 million tonnes of goods was carried by Railways in the first and last year, but its value fluctuated to remain below 40 millions tonnes during the period given.
- The charts below shows the percentage is of students joining north west University 89
- Academic IELTS Writing task 1 Sample 103 - Quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 73
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town. 84
- the bar chart shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nsport during the entire period, whereas pipeline was least used. Goods transport...
^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... of commodities were transported in 1974 . It gradually increased with minor decli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11940298507 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63532386424 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562189054726 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.4946802489 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140363639633 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072006040941 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491983031006 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936647744412 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472980551104 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.