Attendance in cinema hall for different age groups

Essay topics:

Attendance in cinema hall for different age groups

The line graph illustrates the data about the percentage of people from four different age groups (7-14, 15-24, 25-35, and 35 and over) present in the cinema hall in 19 years period, starting from 1984.
Overall, it can be observed that all age groups exhibit an upward trend whereas the 15-24 age community keeps the leading position over the period.
Examining the dataset in more detail, it is clear that in 1984, about 19% of the people aged between 15-24, attended cinema halls.
After a significant growth, it reached 60% in 1994. Thereafter a little fluctuation, it was 65% in 2003 which is the highest percentage of attendance
among all groups over the period. Approximately 10% and 5% of people in 7-14 and 25-35 age groups went to the cinema halls in 1984.
After a large fluctuation over the period, it reached 33% and 35% respectively. People aged of 35 and over displayed less interest in watching the cinema in the cinema hall.
as it was almost zero in 1984. Although it shows a rising trend from 2% in 1984 to 15% in 2003, it is the lowest in the graph among all groups.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-13 Zahid6400 73 view
2024-07-24 nobitaa 73 view
2024-07-15 Zahid6400 56 view
2024-07-09 Sajib Ahamed 84 view
2024-03-20 MinyiChu 70 view
Essays by user Zahid6400 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... is the highest percentage of attendance among all groups over the period. Approx...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...atching the cinema in the cinema hall. as it was almost zero in 1984. Although it...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62886597938 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46378811721 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546391752577 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5011827807 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306455212613 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119286573237 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109841718029 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148796732002 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903898349754 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.