Average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person, 1967-2007

Essay topics:

Average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person, 1967-2007

The bar graph illustrates how much carbon dioxide per individual discharged from 1967 to 2007

Looking at the graph, it can be seen that the amount of carbon dioxide in Italy and Portugal experienced an increase. Meanwhile, the quantity of carbon dioxide in the UK and Sweden decrease

In 1967. The amount of carbon dioxide released by an individual in the UK was the highest, at more than 10 tonnes. While the quantity of CO2 emissions in Sweden stood at just over 8 tonnes per person. By contrast, there were only nearly 2 tonnes of CO2 emitted by a Portuguese citizen. Meanwhile, approximately 4 tonnes of CO2 were produced by each person in Italy

In 2007, The quantity of CO2 emissions in the UK slightly decreased to more than 8 tonnes person. Whereas there was a remarkable drop to less than 6 tonnes in the figure for Sweden, the amount of CO2 in Italy go up gradually approximate 8 tonnes. At the same time, Portugal beheld a rapid rise to about 6 tonnes.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-09 wholemilk 73 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2024-08-18 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-10-13 Lily Ha 70 view
2023-10-06 tr_h.20 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...as the highest, at more than 10 tonnes. While the quantity of CO2 emissions in Sweden...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...O2 were produced by each person in Italy In 2007, The quantity of CO2 emissions i...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63005780347 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67358380941 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1608350708 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357662147042 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146523729419 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100452452764 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224958505943 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740062953362 0.0819641961636 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.