Bar chart
The barchart provides data about how three economic categories: agriculture, manufacturing, and business and financial services contributed to British economy from 1900 to 2000.
At first glance, we can see that business and financial services is the only one sector whichexperienced a steadily increasing contribution over 100 years. In 1900, it had the lowest proportion in the UK financial system with the figure was slightly under 5 percent. But after a century, this figure turned into 35% - as 3.5 times as in 1900 and made services in business and finance become the largest contributor compared to the others.
By contrast, these contributions in both agriculture and manufacturing saw a significant drop by 2000 but with different trend patterns. This trend in manufacturing was obviousmore stable than in farming sector with the highest and smallest figures were approximately 45% and 15% in 1900 and 2000 respectively. Meanwhile, the economic proportion which was contributed by agribusiness had risen from nearly 50% in 1900 to its peak at 52% in 1950 before suddenly dropping 5 times to more than 10% after 25 years and continued to the lowest point which was 3% by 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-11-10 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 61
- High technology is now being harnessed to help the elderly by providing monitoring tracking and perhaps one day robots as companions While there are obvious benefits for the elderly in these developments some people are uneasy about the consequences Discu 72
- The number of elderly people in the world is increasing What do you think are the positive and negative effects of this trend 73
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your own opinion? 84
- People natural resist making changes in their lives. What kind of problems can this cause?What solutions can you suggest? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23036649215 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1457600364 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628272251309 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.5210789841 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.714285714 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.