The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
Given is the bar graph revealing information about how much production and consumption of electricity in ten most countries in 2014. Overall, it can be clearly seen that, the China and United States were the highest number production and consumption of electricity in top rank country. In addition, almost all countries generating electricity were higher than consuming electricity.
So obviously did the figure have that, the country of China and United States in generating and using electricity, standing at number one and two rank of country, counted to about 5,400 (billion kWh) and around 4,000 (billion kWh) respectively. Meanwhile, the Korea, Rep, stood at 10 rank of country, having just under 500 (billion kWh) in producing and consuming electricity.
Turning to the another countries, the Russia had same-number production and consumption of electricity at round 1,050 (billion kWh). Moreover, Japan, India, Canada, France and Brazil, taking rank of country from 4 to 8 in producing and using electricity between 1,000 and 500 billion kWh. By contrast, The electric consumption in Germany was higher than electric production, at around 60 billion kWh
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | msolanki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 90
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 84
- The charts A and B show the share of the UK and Australian cinema market in 2001 and cinema admission in the UK and Australia from 1976 to 2006. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- At present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of young people.do the advantges of this situation outweigh the advantages? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41988950276 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9563432146 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.23176284 43.030603864 238% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.5 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227551119425 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133086187144 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116942082396 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173678579095 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133151469135 0.0819641961636 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.2329268293 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.