The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The table shows different sources of fuel for producing electricity and their percentage use in five European countries in 2001. Generally, the five countries showed a significant difference in their patterns of consumption. Taking nuclear fuel first, Belgium had the highest percentage at 58%, with Sweden second at 45%. In marked contrast, Italy used no nuclear power at all. Turning to coal and lignite, Germany and Britain used this to generate a large proportion of their electricity (50% and 34% respectively), a much higher percentage than the remaining countries.
Regarding petroleum products, Italy produced 27% of its electricity from this source. In comparison, the other countries only generated 2% or less of their electricity from this fuel. However, hydro and wind reveal another pattern with Sweden producing almost half of its electricity (49%) this way (over twice as high as Italy which had the second highest percentage at 20%). Finally, a significant amount was produced from other sources with three countries (Britain, Italy, and Sweden) generating around 40% of their electricity from other fuels.
Overall, it can be seen that there was a significant variation in which fuels countries used to generate their electricity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | msolanki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999. 73
- The graph and chart below give information about species extinctions and the threats to plant life. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993 87
- The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on a 2 groups of workers:those aged from 18- 30 and those aged 45-60 ,and shows factors affecting their work performance. 84
- The charts below show the proportions of the world’s oil resources held in different areas, together with the proportions consumed annually in the same areas. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, regarding, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42268041237 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86263989968 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592783505155 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.9768120718 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119070868736 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591022496094 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517737412514 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789276858036 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292550115438 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.