The bar chart shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities; Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart presents an overview about different measures of waste management (landfill, incineration, recycling and compositing) in four regions, including Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur and Amman.
Overall, it is significant that landfill and incineration were the most common way of waste disposal in four cities; the highest figure belonged to landfill in Toronto.
As can be clearly observed from the chart, Toronto citizens disposed more than 70% of their waste by landfilling, nearly doubling the proportion of this method in Amman. In contrast, this measure was outstriped by incineration in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur and only occupied for 29% and 17% respectively. In terms of incineration, Kuala Lumpur was ranked first at over half of the waste, followed by Madrid at sharply 40%.
Another note-worthing point was a similarity in the amount of recycling and compositing waste in Madrid and Kuala Lumpur, particularly at 23% and 8% respectively. Moreover, while there was a gap of 9% between the percentage of recycling and compositing in Amman, these methods illustrated a same share in
Toronto.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-10 | Jenny213987 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011 73
- some countries there is is insufficient recycling of waste materials (eg paper, glass and cans). What are the reasons and solutions? 73
- Art classes like painting and drawing are important for children’s development and should be made compulsory in high school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Nowadays, most countries improve the standard of living through economic development. But some social values are lost as a result. Do you think th advantages of the phenomenon outweigh the disadvantages? 11
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hese methods illustrated a same share in Toronto.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41714285714 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06727825904 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628571428571 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9276859353 43.030603864 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300450237284 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132438279806 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629209282787 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176386059206 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614635505366 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.