the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000,2005 and 2010
The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of youngsters in four different countries taking part in higher education programs in three years including 2000, 2005 and 2010.
In general, it is apparent that the figure for the young joining higher education in country D was the highest, whereas the lowest proportion recorded was that of country B. It is also noteworthy that the percentage of young people participating in higher education in country A and D increased gradually while those of the remaining nations fluctuated.
36% of youngsters in country A attended upper education in 2000. The year 2005 witnessed a steady rise to approximately 48% before a growth to 58% was recorded at the end of the period. A similar pattern was seen in the figure for country D, which was 60% in 2000 then rose to 65% in 2005 before it underwent a sharp increase to a peak of 80% in 2010.
In contrast, the figures for the too remaining countries stayed relatively constant during the given period. Despite its slight drop from 40% to 38% in 2005, the percentage of young people joining higher education in country B climbed to the initial level in 2010. On the other hand, that of country C increased slightly from 50% to 52% in 2005 and stayed unchanged until the end of the time frame.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-09 | phạm khánh linh | 78 | view |
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- the bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- SOME PEOPLE THINK GOVERNMENTS SHOULD TAKE MEASURE TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF ITS CITIZENS OTHER THINK IT MUST BE MANAGED BY INDIVIDUALS DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION 73
- the pie charts below show 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78125 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7002655706 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517857142857 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3898642787 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343026588425 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145302248411 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113907768426 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218431452819 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642018411326 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.