The bar graph depicts the extent of participation in education and science from people of developing and industrialized countries in the years 1980 and 1990. It compares different aspects like the number of years spent on schooling, scientists and technicians in every thousand persons, and expenditure on research and development during these years.
Overall, industrialized nations lead by large margins in all aspects during this period. There was an increase in numbers between these years in the case of countries that are industrialized. Developing countries on the other hand showed a rise in these cases except for expenditure on research and development where it fell.
Between 1980 and 1990, There was no significant increase in average schooling years in developing countries while the other rose from 8 to 10 approximately. In the same duration, there were a drastic surge in the number of scientists and technicians per 1000 people in industrialized nations from 40 to almost 70 whereas the latter was below 20 all along.
In the case of spending on research and development, industrialized countries skyrocketed from 150 in 1980 to 350 in 1990. Developing nations, in contrast, declined from 50 to roughly 20 between 1980 and 1990.
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are used in many countries The use of alternative sources of energy including wind and solar power is encouraged Is this trend is a positive or negative development 56
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes an 67
- Some people think success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think money and appearance are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Government should put tax on unhealthy food to promote better health Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think the increasing business and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects Others say it causes the loss of national identities Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and incl 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velopment where it fell. Between 1980 and 1990, There was no significant incre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, except for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1056.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30653266332 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16460852276 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4596214933 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.333333333 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259674173186 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11772560911 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109685868772 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164282178699 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571311358981 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.