The bar charts below show UK and US energy consumption in 2000 and 2006
A glance at the bar graphs provided reveals some different UK from US about the percentage of using energy between 2000 and 2006.
Overall, the energy of oil, coal and gas were used more than others by 2 countries. Moreover, the UK tented to consume lower than the US in the same energy.
Clearly, in 2000, the proportion of oil in America was remarkable higher 48%, which was higher than the figure for the UK (38%). By contrast, sharp decreasing approximately at 10% of America and 8% of the UK in the other renewable sources were considerably less common than the proportion of coal, gas and nuclear in the same year.
In 2006, the figure for 2 countries has fluctuation at 5 artificial energies. Rapid increasing in the USA people used oil account for 40% which was compared with the figure in 2000. However, the percentage of gas and other renewable resources was plunged (25% and 5% respectively). Meanwhile, in British, the figure for gas was rose markedly from approximately from 20% in 2000 to 39% in 2006. People used nuclear energy was 10% in the UK, 3 times lower than oil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-14 | Manideep Macherla | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | PRAMODH k | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar charts below show UK and US energy consumption in 2000 and 2006 77
- Some people think that the students should have a gap year Do you agree or disagree 91
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disvantages? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther renewable sources were considerably less common than the proportion of coal...
^^
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rces were considerably less common than the proportion of coal, gas and nuclear ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69270833333 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66853267232 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1194176241 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196236673741 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869774782384 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076906126732 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148627359462 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862843424573 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.