The bar graph below represents data about the clubs joined by people of two different age groups at a leisure centre in a small city.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph represents a comparison between the number of individuals who entered into different types of clubs for leisure time activities based on two age groups in a small city.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is the popularity of gardening was more among the old aged people, while the lowest number of young stars attended in this club. On the other hand, in the cycling club the number of young members was far higher than the old age.
To begin with the gardening club, where only 25 people joined who were aged between 25-35, whereas the number of the second group was more than twice. The opposite trend was observed in the case of arts and crafts, the difference between the two aged groups was 40. The photography club had the same number of people from both groups which was approximately 45.
Then turning to the other three clubs, among these, fitness and music/dance had the same numerical value (50) for the second, in the case of the first group the difference between them was not more than 4. Finally, the cycling club, in this club 65 youth people attended, while only 10 old people were members of this club.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-18 | Sanaullah97 | 76 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | Sanaullah97 | 61 | view |
- The bar graph below represents the data about the clubs joined by the people of two different age groups at a leisure centre in a small city Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 61
- The table below shows the expenses per week of a retired single person and a couple in Australia for their comfortable lifestyle Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about global sales of games software CDs and DVD or video Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- International student enrolment in British universities 2009 2014 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, then, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66502463054 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.23152165638 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.947331922 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.375 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 5.23603664747 205% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219820142063 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108370178042 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704178798907 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15498125398 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787160396344 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.